» Articles » PMID: 7396472

Effect of Orally Administered Probenecid on the Pharmacokinetics of Cefoxitin

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1980 May 1
PMID 7396472
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To characterize the effect of orally administered probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in healthy male volunteers, we administered to one group of six subjects 2 g of cefoxitin by intravenous (i.v.) bolus either alone, with 1 g of probenecid concomitantly, or when 1 g of probenecid was administered 1 h previously by using a crossover design. Likewise, we administered to a second group of six subjects 2 g of cefoxitin intramuscularly (i.m.) together with 1 and 2 g of probenecid. Probenecid increased the mean terminal half-life and the area under the serum cefoxitin concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) and decreased renal clearance, but did not alter the volume of the central compartment or the total urinary recovery of i.v.-administered cefoxitin; pretreatment with probenecid produced a greater increase in cefoxitin AUC0-24 and a constant decrease in renal clearance compared to concomitant probenecid. The AUC0-24 after i.m.-administered cefoxitin was greater after 2 g than 1 g of probenecid; the AUC0-24 after i.v.-and i.m.-administered cefoxitin was similar after 1 g of probenecid was given concomitantly. Cefoxitin AUC0-24 was increased further when 1 g of probenecid was given before i.v.-administered cefoxitin or when 2 g of probenecid was given with i.m.-administered cefoxitin. The effect of probenecid was related to both timing and dose.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Renal Anionic Secretion Following Living-donor and Deceased-donor Renal Transplantation: A Clinical Pharmacokinetic Study of Cefoxitin Microdosing.

Kalluri H, Sood P, Zhao W, Randhawa P, Tevar A, Hariharan S Transplant Direct. 2020; 6(6):e561.

PMID: 33062845 PMC: 7531749. DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001001.


Inhibitory Effects of Probenecid on Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Emtricitabine for On-Demand HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis.

Liu S, Gufford B, Lu J, Bushman L, Anderson P, Bergstrom R Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 107(5):1200-1208.

PMID: 31675437 PMC: 7703849. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1714.


Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions.

Ivanyuk A, Livio F, Biollaz J, Buclin T Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017; 56(8):825-892.

PMID: 28210973 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-017-0506-8.


Population pharmacokinetics of prophylactic cefoxitin in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Isla A, Troconiz I, de Tejada I, Vazquez S, Canut A, Muriel Lopez J Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 68(5):735-45.

PMID: 22246211 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-1206-1.


Competitive inhibition of renal tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin and metabolite by probenecid.

Landersdorfer C, Kirkpatrick C, Kinzig M, Bulitta J, Holzgrabe U, Jaehde U Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 69(2):167-78.

PMID: 20233180 PMC: 2824478. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03564.x.


References
1.
Gibaldi M, Schwartz M . Apparent effect of probenecid on the distribution of penicillins in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1968; 9(3):345-9. DOI: 10.1002/cpt196893345. View

2.
Jusko W, Gibaldi M . Effects of change in elimination on varous parameters of the two-compartment open model. J Pharm Sci. 1972; 61(8):1270-3. DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600610820. View

3.
Foord R . Cefuroxime: human pharmacokinetics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976; 9(5):741-7. PMC: 429614. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.9.5.741. View

4.
Yeh K . Kinetic parameter estimation by numerical algorithms and multiple linear regression: theoretical. J Pharm Sci. 1977; 66(12):1688-91. DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600661208. View

5.
Yeh K, Kwan K . A comparison of numerical integrating algorithms by trapezoidal, Lagrange, and spline approximation. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1978; 6(1):79-98. DOI: 10.1007/BF01066064. View