» Articles » PMID: 7387148

Antibiotic Therapy of Experimental Staphylococcus Epidermidis Endocarditis

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1980 Feb 1
PMID 7387148
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endocarditis was produced in rabbits with a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate. Subpopulations resistant to other semisynthetic penicillins and cephalosporins were detected in the isolate. Their presence was probably responsible for the increase in minimum bactericidal concentrations and minimum inhibitory concentrations when tests with high inocula, rather than low inocula were pursued. Rabbits were treated for either 2 or 7 days with nafcillin, cephalothin, cefamandole, vancomycin, rifampin, or gentamicin. Spontaneous death was uncommon in either controls (84% survival) or treated animals (80 to 94% survival). There was no significant difference in the number of bacteria in vegetations of rabbits treated for 7 days with cephalothin, cefamandole, nafcillin, or no antibiotic (control). There was a significant reduction in total bacteria in vegetations of rabbits given vancomycin, gentamicin, or rifampin for 7 days as compared with cephalothin, cefamandole, nafcillin or control. Gentamicin or rifampin sterilized significantly more vegetations after 7 days than cephalothin, cefamandole, nafcillin, or control; rifampin was more effective in sterilizing vegetations than either gentamycin or vancomycin after 2 days. Mutants resistant to 10 mug of rifampin per ml comprised the total bacterial population cultured from vegetations of 2 of 17 rabbits treated with this antibiotic for 7 days; there was no change in the susceptibility of vegetation isolates to other antibiotics. Rifampin, vancomycin, or gentamicin may prove to be more effective in humans than cephalosporins or semisynthetic penicillins in the treatment of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis endocarditis.

Citing Articles

Association between adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use and outcomes for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis: a propensity-score adjusted retrospective cohort study.

Suzuki H, Pandya A, Hasegawa S, Tholany J Infection. 2024; .

PMID: 39441462 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02421-8.


Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management.

Galar A, Weil A, Dudzinski D, Munoz P, Siedner M Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019; 32(2).

PMID: 30760474 PMC: 6431130. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00041-18.


Intracardiac device and prosthetic infections: What do we know?.

Johnston L, Conly J Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2007; 15(4):205-9.

PMID: 18159493 PMC: 2094979. DOI: 10.1155/2004/903428.


Role of mecA transcriptional regulation in the phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Niemeyer D, Pucci M, Thanassi J, Sharma V, Archer G J Bacteriol. 1996; 178(18):5464-71.

PMID: 8808937 PMC: 178368. DOI: 10.1128/jb.178.18.5464-5471.1996.


Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Archer G, Climo M Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994; 38(10):2231-7.

PMID: 7840550 PMC: 284723. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.38.10.2231.


References
1.
dOliveira J . Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of rifampin in meningeal tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972; 106(3):432-7. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1972.106.3.432. View

2.
Slaughter L, Morris J, Starr A . Prosthetic valvular endocarditis. A 12-year review. Circulation. 1973; 47(6):1319-26. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.47.6.1319. View

3.
Dismukes W, Karchmer A, Buckley M, Austen W, SWARTZ M . Prosthetic valve endocarditis. Analysis of 38 cases. Circulation. 1973; 48(2):365-77. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.48.2.365. View

4.
Sande M, Johnson M . Antimicrobial therapy of experimental endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 1975; 131(4):367-75. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/131.4.367. View

5.
Pelletier Jr L, Petersdorf R, Nielson K . Chemotherapy of experimental streptococcal endocarditis. V. Effect of duration of infection and retained intracardiac catheter on response to treatment. J Lab Clin Med. 1976; 87(4):692-702. View