» Articles » PMID: 7011991

Comparison of Enterotoxic Activities of Heat-stable Enterotoxins from Class 1 and Class 2 Escherichia Coli of Swine Origin

Overview
Journal Infect Immun
Date 1981 Jan 1
PMID 7011991
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pig small intestine develops age-dependent resistance to some (class 2 strains) enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli while remaining susceptible to others (class 1 strains). This study tested the hypothesis that class 1 and class 2 strains produce different subtypes of heat-stable enterotoxin (ST). The dose-response curves of small intestine to crude ST preparations from a class 1 and a class 2 strain were compared in several species. In infant mice, the class 1 ST preparation was less active than the class 2 ST preparation, whereas in rabbits the preparations were equally potent. However, in 1-, 7-, and 14-week-old pigs, the class 1 ST preparation was more active than the class 2 preparation. At low doses, both preparations caused reduced absorption in pigs of all three age groups, and at high doses the class 1 preparation caused secretion in all three age groups. In contrast, at high doses the class 2 preparation caused secretion in 1-week-old pigs but only reduced absorption in older pigs. when class 1 and class 2 ST preparations were fractionated by methanol extraction, in both cases the mouse-negative, pig-positive activity was associated with the methanol-insoluble fraction and mouse-positive, pig-positive activity was associated with the methanol-soluble fraction. The results are consistent with a hypothesis that class 1 and class 2 strains of enterotoxigenic E. coli produce different subtypes of ST and that the response of pig intestine to ST varies with both age and toxin subtype.

Citing Articles

Experimental infection of post-weaned pigs with F18-encoding enterotoxigenic and enterotoxigenic/shigatoxigenic strain isolated from the diarrheic feces in Korea.

Baek K, Tangchang W, Choi E, Lee W, Lee K, Lee H Open Vet J. 2023; 13(6):705-714.

PMID: 37545702 PMC: 10399650. DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i6.5.


Intestinal challenge with enterotoxigenic in pigs, and nutritional intervention to prevent postweaning diarrhea.

Sun Y, Kim S Anim Nutr. 2018; 3(4):322-330.

PMID: 29767133 PMC: 5941267. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.10.001.


Animal Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Dubreuil J, Isaacson R, Schifferli D EcoSal Plus. 2016; 7(1).

PMID: 27735786 PMC: 5123703. DOI: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0006-2016.


Comparison of virulence gene profiles of Escherichia coli strains isolated from healthy and diarrheic swine.

Chapman T, Wu X, Barchia I, Bettelheim K, Driesen S, Trott D Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(7):4782-95.

PMID: 16820472 PMC: 1489375. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02885-05.


Sulfatide from the pig jejunum brush border epithelial cell surface is involved in binding of Escherichia coli enterotoxin b.

Rousset E, Harel J, Dubreuil J Infect Immun. 1998; 66(12):5650-8.

PMID: 9826338 PMC: 108714. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.12.5650-5658.1998.


References
1.
Smith H, Halls S . Studies on Escherichia coli enterotoxin. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1967; 93(2):531-43. DOI: 10.1002/path.1700930212. View

2.
Kohler E . Enterotoxic activity of filtrates of escherichia coli in young pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1968; 29(12):2263-74. View

3.
Gyles C, Barnum D . A heat-labile enterotoxin from strains of Eschericha coli enteropathogenic for pigs. J Infect Dis. 1969; 120(4):419-26. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/120.4.419. View

4.
Moon H, Whipp S . Development of resistance with age by swine intestine to effects of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis. 1970; 122(3):220-3. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/122.3.220. View

5.
Smith H, Gyles C . The relationship between two apparently different enterotoxins produced by enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli of porcine origin. J Med Microbiol. 1970; 3(3):387-401. DOI: 10.1099/00222615-3-3-387. View