» Articles » PMID: 699994

Integration in Descending Motor Pathways Controlling the Forelimb in the Cat. 5. Properties of and Monosynaptic Excitatory Convergence on C3--C4 Propriospinal Neurones

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1978 Sep 15
PMID 699994
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recording was made in the C3--C4 segments from cell bodies of propriospinal neurones identified by their antidromic activation from more caudal segments. Monosynaptic excitatory effects from descending motor pathways and primary afferents were investigated by electrical stimulation of higher motor centres and peripheral nerves in the forelimb and neck. The cell bodies were located mainly laterally in Rexed's layer VII. Threshold mapping for single axons showed that they descend in the lateroventral part of the lateral funicle. Antidromic stimulation at different spinal cord levels showed that some neurones terminated in the forelimb segments, others in the thoracic cord or in the lumbar segments. Terminal slowing of the conduction velocity suggested axonal branching over some segments. Monosynaptic EPSPs were evoked in the neurons by stimulation of the contralateral pyramid, red nucleus and dorsal tegmentum-superior colliculus. It is concluded that corticospinal, rubrospinal and tectospinal fibres project directly to both short and long propriospinal neurones. There was marked frequency potentiation in tectospinal synapses. Convergence from two descending tracts was common and in half of the tested cells all three tracts contributed monosynaptic excitation. Experiments with collision of descending volleys and antidromic volleys from the brachial segments demonstrated that the corticospinal and rubrospinal monosynaptic projection to the propriospinal neurones is by collaterals from fibres continuing to the forelimb segments.

Citing Articles

Origin of Multisynaptic Corticospinal Pathway to Forelimb Segments in Macaques and Its Reorganization After Spinal Cord Injury.

Ninomiya T, Nakagawa H, Inoue K, Nishimura Y, Oishi T, Yamashita T Front Neural Circuits. 2022; 16:847100.

PMID: 35463202 PMC: 9020432. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2022.847100.


Transneuronal tracing to map connectivity in injured and transplanted spinal networks.

Fortino T, Randelman M, Hall A, Singh J, Bloom D, Engel E Exp Neurol. 2022; 351:113990.

PMID: 35085573 PMC: 9361710. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113990.


Mechanism of Restoration of Forelimb Motor Function after Cervical Spinal Cord Hemisection in Rats: Electrophysiological Verification.

Takeuchi T, Takahashi M, Satomi K, Ohne H, Hasegawa A, Sato S Behav Neurol. 2017; 2017:7514681.

PMID: 29259352 PMC: 5702418. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7514681.


The Impact of Shoulder Abduction Loading on Volitional Hand Opening and Grasping in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke.

Lan Y, Yao J, Dewald J Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017; 31(6):521-529.

PMID: 28506146 PMC: 5505320. DOI: 10.1177/1545968317697033.


Reassessment of Non-Monosynaptic Excitation from the Motor Cortex to Motoneurons in Single Motor Units of the Human Biceps Brachii.

Nakajima T, Tazoe T, Sakamoto M, Endoh T, Shibuya S, Elias L Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:19.

PMID: 28194103 PMC: 5276998. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00019.


References
1.
Illert M, Lundberg A, Tanaka R . Integration in descending motor pathways controlling the forelimb in the cat. 1. Pyramidal effects on motoneurones. Exp Brain Res. 1976; 26(5):509-19. DOI: 10.1007/BF00238824. View

2.
Roberts W, SMITH D . Analysis of threshold currents during microstimulation of fibres in the spinal cord. Acta Physiol Scand. 1973; 89(3):384-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1973.tb05533.x. View

3.
Shinoda Y, Ghez C, Arnold A . Spinal branching of rubrospinal axons in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1977; 30(2-3):203-18. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237251. View

4.
Anderson M, Yoshida M, Wilson V . Influence of superior colliculus on cat neck motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1971; 34(5):898-907. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1971.34.5.898. View

5.
Giovanelli Barilari M, Kuypers H . Propriospinal fibers interconnecting the spinal enlargements in the cat. Brain Res. 1969; 14(2):321-30. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90113-9. View