» Articles » PMID: 6933532

Composition of Native and Reconstituted Chromatin Particles: Direct Mass Determination by Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 1980 Aug 1
PMID 6933532
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chromatin particles reconstituted from 145-base-pair lengths of DNA and either the arginine-rich histones H3 and H4 only or all four nucleosomal core histones have been compared with native nucleosomes in terms of their ultrastructure and mass distribution, as determined by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). The mass of the nucleosome derived from STEM analysis was very close to that calculated for its DNA and histone components. The reconstituted particles showed a broader mass distribution, but it was clear that the majority contained at least eight histone molecules. This was to be expected for structures reconstituted from all four core histones, but in the case of H3H4-DNA complexes clearly showed that an octamer rather than tetramer of these histones was required to fold nucleosomal DNA into a stable compact particle. The significance of the H3H4 octamer complex with respect to nucleosomal structure is discussed, and the evidence that nucleosomal DNA can accept even greater numbers of histones is considered.

Citing Articles

Membrane crystals of plant light-harvesting complex II disassemble reversibly in light.

Hind G, Wall J, Varkonyi Z, Istokovics A, Lambrev P, Garab G Plant Cell Physiol. 2014; 55(7):1296-303.

PMID: 24793749 PMC: 4184361. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu064.


Imaging and elemental mapping of biological specimens with a dual-EDS dedicated scanning transmission electron microscope.

Wu J, Kim A, Bleher R, Myers B, Marvin R, Inada H Ultramicroscopy. 2013; 128:24-31.

PMID: 23500508 PMC: 3658130. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.01.004.


Development and application of STEM for the biological sciences.

Sousa A, Leapman R Ultramicroscopy. 2012; 123:38-49.

PMID: 22749213 PMC: 3500455. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.04.005.


Structural analysis of reconstituted lipoproteins containing the N-terminal domain of apolipoprotein B.

Jiang Z, Simon M, Wall J, McKnight C Biophys J. 2007; 92(11):4097-108.

PMID: 17369413 PMC: 1868998. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.101105.


Structure of recombinant rat UBF by electron image analysis and homology modelling.

Neil K, Ridsdale R, Rutherford B, Taylor L, Larson D, Glibetic M Nucleic Acids Res. 1996; 24(8):1472-80.

PMID: 8628680 PMC: 145827. DOI: 10.1093/nar/24.8.1472.


References
1.
Schacterle G, POLLACK R . A simplified method for the quantitative assay of small amounts of protein in biologic material. Anal Biochem. 1973; 51(2):654-5. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90523-x. View

2.
Kornberg R, Thomas J . Chromatin structure; oligomers of the histones. Science. 1974; 184(4139):865-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.184.4139.865. View

3.
Oudet P, Chambon P . Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit. Cell. 1975; 4(4):281-300. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90149-x. View

4.
Langmore J, Wooley J . Chromatin architecture: investigation of a subunit of chromatin by dark field electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975; 72(7):2691-5. PMC: 432836. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2691. View

5.
Woodcock C, Sweetman H, Frado L . Structural repeating units in chromatin. II. Their isolation and partial characterization. Exp Cell Res. 1976; 97:111-9. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90660-1. View