A Simultaneous Treatment Comparison of Three Expressive Language Training Programs with a Mute Autistic Child
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
A study was conducted in order to simultaneously compare the relative effectiveness of three different language training models (total communication sign training, nonverbal "sign-alone" training, and oral [vocal] training) for teaching expressive language skills to a 4 1/2-year-old mute autistic child. A single-subject, alternating-treatment (multielement) design with replication within subject was used to compare the rate of expressive word acquisition across training models. Results show the total communication model to be substantially superior to both oral and sign-alone training models, and place in question the theory of an intersensory integration disability to explain the success of sign language. Alternatively, the data suggest that the use of physical prompts combined with multisensory inputs provide a basis for the demonstrated success.
McCleery J, Elliott N, Sampanis D, Stefanidou C Front Integr Neurosci. 2013; 7:30.
PMID: 23630476 PMC: 3634796. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00030.
Ganz J, Simpson R J Autism Dev Disord. 2004; 34(4):395-409.
PMID: 15449515 DOI: 10.1023/b:jadd.0000037416.59095.d7.
Communication intervention for children with autism: a review of treatment efficacy.
Goldstein H J Autism Dev Disord. 2002; 32(5):373-96.
PMID: 12463516 DOI: 10.1023/a:1020589821992.
Hinerman P, Jenson W, Walker G, Petersen P J Autism Dev Disord. 1982; 12(3):253-63.
PMID: 7153200 DOI: 10.1007/BF01531371.
Using pictorial representations as communication means with low-functioning children.
Lancioni G J Autism Dev Disord. 1983; 13(1):87-105.
PMID: 6853441 DOI: 10.1007/BF01531362.