An Alternating Treatment Comparison of Oral and Total Communications Training Programs with Echolalic Autistic Children
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
An alternating treatment comparison was conducted of the relative effectiveness of oral and total communication training models for teaching expressive labeling skills to three echolalic autistic children. The results of this comparison demonstrated that total communication proved to be the most successful approach with each of the subjects. In addition, the replication of these findings both within and across subjects suggest that total communication may be, in general, the most effective of these two training models for teaching basic vocal language skills to echolalic children. A number of hypotheses are presented that may provide a basis for the demonstrated effect.
Zane E, Arunachalam S, Luyster R J Cult Cogn Sci. 2022; 5(3):389-404.
PMID: 34977462 PMC: 8716020. DOI: 10.1007/s41809-021-00087-4.
McCleery J, Elliott N, Sampanis D, Stefanidou C Front Integr Neurosci. 2013; 7:30.
PMID: 23630476 PMC: 3634796. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00030.
A behaviorist's response to the report of the national commission on excellence in education.
Sulzer-Azaroff B Behav Anal. 2012; 8(1):29-38.
PMID: 22478618 PMC: 2741770. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391910.
Strategic and tactical limits of comparison studies.
Johnston J Behav Anal. 2012; 11(1):1-9.
PMID: 22477989 PMC: 2741858. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392448.
Measures in intervention research with young children who have autism.
Wolery M, Garfinkle A J Autism Dev Disord. 2002; 32(5):463-78.
PMID: 12463520 DOI: 10.1023/a:1020598023809.