» Articles » PMID: 6654770

An Alternating Treatment Comparison of Oral and Total Communications Training Programs with Echolalic Autistic Children

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1983 Jan 1
PMID 6654770
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An alternating treatment comparison was conducted of the relative effectiveness of oral and total communication training models for teaching expressive labeling skills to three echolalic autistic children. The results of this comparison demonstrated that total communication proved to be the most successful approach with each of the subjects. In addition, the replication of these findings both within and across subjects suggest that total communication may be, in general, the most effective of these two training models for teaching basic vocal language skills to echolalic children. A number of hypotheses are presented that may provide a basis for the demonstrated effect.

Citing Articles

Personal Pronoun Errors in Form versus Meaning Produced by Children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Zane E, Arunachalam S, Luyster R J Cult Cogn Sci. 2022; 5(3):389-404.

PMID: 34977462 PMC: 8716020. DOI: 10.1007/s41809-021-00087-4.


Motor development and motor resonance difficulties in autism: relevance to early intervention for language and communication skills.

McCleery J, Elliott N, Sampanis D, Stefanidou C Front Integr Neurosci. 2013; 7:30.

PMID: 23630476 PMC: 3634796. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00030.


A behaviorist's response to the report of the national commission on excellence in education.

Sulzer-Azaroff B Behav Anal. 2012; 8(1):29-38.

PMID: 22478618 PMC: 2741770. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391910.


Strategic and tactical limits of comparison studies.

Johnston J Behav Anal. 2012; 11(1):1-9.

PMID: 22477989 PMC: 2741858. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392448.


Measures in intervention research with young children who have autism.

Wolery M, Garfinkle A J Autism Dev Disord. 2002; 32(5):463-78.

PMID: 12463520 DOI: 10.1023/a:1020598023809.


References
1.
Lovaas O, Schreibman L . Stimulus overselectivity of autistic children in a two stimulus situation. Behav Res Ther. 1971; 9(4):305-10. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(71)90042-8. View

2.
Barlow D, Hayes S . Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979; 12(2):199-210. PMC: 1311363. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199. View

3.
Casey L . Development of communicative behavior in autistic children: a parent program using manual signs. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1978; 8(1):45-59. DOI: 10.1007/BF01550277. View

4.
Rutter M . Concepts of autism: a review of research. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1968; 9(1):1-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1968.tb02204.x. View

5.
FAY W . On the echolalia of the blind and of the autistic child. J Speech Hear Disord. 1973; 38(4):478-89. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.3804.478. View