» Articles » PMID: 6814470

Double-blind Comparison of the Respiratory and Sedative Effects of Codeine Phosphate and (+/-)-glaucine Phosphate in Human Volunteers

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1982 Oct 1
PMID 6814470
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1 Two antitussive agents (+/-)-glaucine phosphate and codeine phosphate have been compared with placebo with respect to ventilation, ventilatory response to carbon dioxide, pulse, blood pressure, digit symbol substitution, sedation score and the Zahlen-Verbindung test performance in ten healthy volunteers (22-36 years). The study was double-blind and the two doses of each antitussive agent and the placebo were administered as a syrup. 2 Both codeine phosphate and (+/-)-glaucine phosphate displaced the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide to the right. 3 The effect of codeine phosphate on the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide was not dose dependent: 30 mg produced greater effects than the 60 mg dose. 4 Only the highest dose of (+/-)-glaucine phosphate (60 mg) caused respiratory depression and this was associated with sedation and decreased performance in the digit symbol substitution test. 5 Neither antitussive agent had significant effects upon pulse or blood pressure and codeine phosphate had no detectable sedative activity.

Citing Articles

LNC942 promoting METTL14-mediated mA methylation in breast cancer cell proliferation and progression.

Sun T, Wu Z, Wang X, Wang Y, Hu X, Qin W Oncogene. 2020; 39(31):5358-5372.

PMID: 32576970 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-1338-9.


The role of the opioid system in decision making and cognitive control: A review.

van Steenbergen H, Eikemo M, Leknes S Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019; 19(3):435-458.

PMID: 30963411 PMC: 6599188. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-019-00710-6.


Antitussive drugs--past, present, and future.

Dicpinigaitis P, Morice A, Birring S, McGarvey L, Smith J, Canning B Pharmacol Rev. 2014; 66(2):468-512.

PMID: 24671376 PMC: 11060423. DOI: 10.1124/pr.111.005116.


Codeine and clinical impairment in samples in which morphine is not detected.

Bachs L, Skurtveit S, Morland J Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003; 58(12):785-9.

PMID: 12698303 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-003-0561-y.


Objective evaluation of dextromethorphan and glaucine as antitussive agents.

Ruhle K, CRISCUOLO D, Dieterich H, Kohler D, Riedel G Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984; 17(5):521-4.

PMID: 6375709 PMC: 1463443. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02384.x.


References
1.
Adler T, FUJIMOTO J, WAY E, BAKER E . The metabolic fate of codeine in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1955; 114(3):251-62. View

2.
McKay J, Linaker B, Turnberg L . Influence of opiates on ion transport across rabbit ileal mucosa. Gastroenterology. 1981; 80(2):279-84. View

3.
Pleuvry B, MADDISON S . A sex difference in the effects of oral codeine and promethazine on the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide in human volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980; 9(2):159-64. PMC: 1429854. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb05827.x. View

4.
CHACHAJ W, Malolepszy J, Jankowska R . [Action of Tussiglaucin--a new antitussive and anti-asthmatic agent]. Pol Tyg Lek. 1972; 27(52):2071-3. View

5.
Dierckx P, Leblanc G, Decoster A, CRISCUOLO D . Double-blind study of glaucine in chronic cough. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1981; 19(9):396-9. View