» Articles » PMID: 6802855

On the Dynamics of the Microfilament System in HeLa Cells

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1982 Apr 1
PMID 6802855
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We measured the pools of unpolymerized and filamentous actin in homogenates of HeLa cells made in several different lysis buffers, as well as after treatment of cells with a variety of chemicals or trypsin, and after adenovirus (type 2) infection. This was possible when a series of factors concerning the basic culture conditions were kept constant: e.g., serum type used, serum batch, cell density, time after subcultivation of cells, and buffering substance in the medium. Homogenates from untreated cells usually contain 35-45 percent of the total actin in an unpolymerized form. With some batches of cells this number can be as high as 50 percent. In sparse cultures (3 x 10(4) cell/cm(2)), HeLa cells contain approximately 10 pg actin/cell, while the corresponding number is only 5 pg in dense cultures (3 x 10(5) cells/cm(2)). Treatment of cells with cytochalasin B increases the pool of unpolymerized actin by approximately 30-40 percent, while colchicine decreases the fraction of unpolymerized actin by 20 percent. The oxidant diamide increases the filamentous actin pool 25-50 percent. Glucose, sodium azide, dinitrophenol, serum starvation, or thymidine treatment does not affect the distribution between unpolymerized and filamentous actin to any significant extent. Trypsin and EDTA induced rounding up of cells but did not change the actin distribution. The distribution of actin between G- and F-forms was unchanged after adenovirus infection. These results show that significant changes in the actin pools can be induced in nucleated cells. However, several treatments which alter the morphology and motility of cells are not accompanied by an alteration in the G-/F-actin ratio.

Citing Articles

Rapid ensemble measurement of protein diffusion and probe blinking dynamics in cells.

Sehayek S, Yi X, Weiss S, Wiseman P Biophys Rep (N Y). 2022; 1(2):100015.

PMID: 36425455 PMC: 9680803. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpr.2021.100015.


Controlling the cortical actin motor.

Grantham J, Lassing I, Karlsson R Protoplasma. 2012; 249(4):1001-15.

PMID: 22526202 PMC: 3459087. DOI: 10.1007/s00709-012-0403-9.


Carbonylation and disassembly of the F-actin cytoskeleton in oxidant induced barrier dysfunction and its prevention by epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha in a human colonic cell line.

Banan A, Zhang Y, Losurdo J, Keshavarzian A Gut. 2000; 46(6):830-7.

PMID: 10807896 PMC: 1756435. DOI: 10.1136/gut.46.6.830.


Microinjection of ADP-ribosylated actin inhibits actin synthesis in hepatocyte-hepatoma hybrid cells.

Reuner K, van der Does A, Dunker P, Just I, Aktories K, Katz N Biochem J. 1996; 319 ( Pt 3):843-9.

PMID: 8920989 PMC: 1217865. DOI: 10.1042/bj3190843.


Subcellular distribution of rhodamine-actin microinjected into living fibroblastic cells.

Glacy S J Cell Biol. 1983; 97(4):1207-13.

PMID: 6684662 PMC: 2112619. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.97.4.1207.


References
1.
Lin D, Tobin K, Grumet M, Lin S . Cytochalasins inhibit nuclei-induced actin polymerization by blocking filament elongation. J Cell Biol. 1980; 84(2):455-60. PMC: 2110542. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.84.2.455. View

2.
Pollard T . Mechanism of action of cytochalasin B on actin. Cell. 1980; 20(2):329-41. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90619-4. View

3.
Carlsson L, Gylfe E . Actin filament formation in pancreatic beta-cells during glucose stimulation of insulin secretion. FEBS Lett. 1980; 117(1):299-302. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80966-5. View

4.
Morris A, Tannenbaum J . Cytochalasin D does not produce net depolymerization of actin filaments in HEp-2 cells. Nature. 1980; 287(5783):637-9. DOI: 10.1038/287637a0. View

5.
Laub F, Kaplan M, Gitler C . Actin polymerization accompanies Thy-1-capping on mouse thymocytes. FEBS Lett. 1981; 124(1):35-8. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(81)80048-8. View