Active and Passive Touch: the Influence of Exploration Time on Form Recognition
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
In a study of the effect of self-produced movement on tactual form recognition 30 male and 30 female college students actively or passively touched cooky -cutter forms with the preferred index finger to identify the shapes. In a static passive condition, the forms were pressed on the fingers. Ss were limited to either 5 or 30 sec of stimulus exposure time. Results indicate that active touch was superior to either passive static or passive sequential touch. Adding stimulus change failed to improve performance. Recognition accuracy was greater with 30 sec of exposure, but 5 sec of active touch produced accuracy equivalent to that produced by longer periods of passive stimulation.
Poor resolution at the back of the tongue is the bottleneck for spatial pattern recognition.
Pamir Z, Canoluk M, Jung J, Peli E Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):2435.
PMID: 32051455 PMC: 7015888. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59102-3.
Distinction of self-produced touch and social touch at cortical and spinal cord levels.
Boehme R, Hauser S, Gerling G, Heilig M, Olausson H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(6):2290-2299.
PMID: 30670645 PMC: 6369791. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1816278116.
Effects of forced movements on learning: Findings from a choice reaction time task in rats.
Kaneko H, Sano H, Hasegawa Y, Tamura H, Suzuki S Learn Behav. 2017; 45(2):191-204.
PMID: 28091814 PMC: 5429386. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-016-0255-9.
Physical factors influencing pleasant touch during passive fingertip stimulation.
Klocker A, Oddo C, Camboni D, Penta M, Thonnard J PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e101361.
PMID: 25000561 PMC: 4084823. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101361.
Aging and curvature discrimination from static and dynamic touch.
Norman J, Kappers A, Cheeseman J, Ronning C, Thomason K, Baxter M PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e68577.
PMID: 23844224 PMC: 3699499. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068577.