» Articles » PMID: 2216650

Lack of Evidence for a Tactual Poggendorff Illusion

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1990 Sep 1
PMID 2216650
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lucca, Dellantonio, and Riggio (1986) reported large distortions in a tactual analogue of the visual Poggendorff illusion. They also reported large effects in the direction opposite to the visual illusion, which they termed "inversions." However, their evidence for such effects is questionable; they used what we consider to be inappropriate measurement and analysis procedures. In attempting to replicate their experiment, and in conducting four additional experiments, we found no evidence at all for their alleged tactual analogue of the visual Poggendorff effect. Instead, we demonstrated that "inversions" are likely due to the use of a raised stimulus display that causes artifactual mistracking, which is totally unrelated to normal mechanisms of alignment judgment. We also discuss the possible role of intersensory factors in the generation of tactual illusions.

Citing Articles

Geometrical haptic illusions: the role of exploration in the Müller-Lyer, vertical-horizontal, and Delboeuf illusions.

Gentaz E, Hatwell Y Psychon Bull Rev. 2004; 11(1):31-40.

PMID: 15116983 DOI: 10.3758/bf03206457.


The basis of the Bourdon illusion.

Wenderoth P Percept Psychophys. 1991; 49(4):393-7.

PMID: 2030937 DOI: 10.3758/bf03205998.


Geometrical haptic illusions revisited: haptic illusions compared with visual illusions.

Suzuki K, Arashida R Percept Psychophys. 1992; 52(3):329-35.

PMID: 1408643 DOI: 10.3758/bf03209149.

References
1.
Heller M . Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: the advantage of the late blind. Perception. 1989; 18(3):379-89. DOI: 10.1068/p180379. View

2.
Wenderoth P, Johnson M . Relationships between the kinetic, alternating-line, and Poggendorff illusions: the effects of interstimulus interval, inducing parallels, and fixation. Percept Psychophys. 1983; 34(3):273-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202956. View

3.
Tsai L . Mueller-Lyer illusion by the blind. Percept Mot Skills. 1967; 25(2):641-4. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1967.25.2.641. View

4.
Wenderoth P . The distinction between the rod-and-frame illusion and the rod-and-frame test. Perception. 1974; 3(2):205-12. DOI: 10.1068/p030205. View

5.
Heller M . Active and passive touch: the influence of exploration time on form recognition. J Gen Psychol. 1984; 110(2d Half):243-9. DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1984.9709968. View