» Articles » PMID: 6714290

Should the Acetylator Phenotype Be Determined when Prescribing Hydralazine for Hypertension?

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1984 Jan 1
PMID 6714290
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of acetylator phenotype in determining the response to hydralazine when it was added to diuretic and beta-blocker at doses not exceeding 200 mg daily was examined in 57 hypertensive patients. 81% of rapid acetylators needed 200 mg hydralazine daily compared to 38% of slow acetylators (p less than 0.01). Despite higher doses of hydralazine the blood pressure was controlled in only 27% of rapid acetylators compared to 65% of slow acetylators (p less than 0.02). The relation of acetylator phenotype to blood pressure response was statistically independent of initial blood pressure, age, sex, body weight and serum creatinine (p less than 0.005). Current recommendations on hydralazine dosage are unsatisfactory for the 40% of hypertensive patients who are rapid acetylators. We suggest measurement of the acetylator phenotype in patients who respond incompletely to 200 mg hydralazine daily. About 70% of these patients will be rapid acetylators in whom the dose of hydralazine can be increased safely.

Citing Articles

Genetically determined adverse drug reactions involving metabolism.

Lennard M Drug Saf. 1993; 9(1):60-77.

PMID: 8347292 DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199309010-00006.


Comparison of once daily endralazine with placebo in the treatment of hypertension uncontrolled by a beta-blocker and diuretic.

McGourty J, Silas J, PIDGEON J Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985; 29(4):401-3.

PMID: 2868900 DOI: 10.1007/BF00613452.


Genetically determined variability in acetylation and oxidation. Therapeutic implications.

Clark D Drugs. 1985; 29(4):342-75.

PMID: 2859977 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198529040-00003.


Allopathy--the therapeutic legacy.

Johnston G Ir J Med Sci. 1989; 158(1):4-9.

PMID: 2661491 DOI: 10.1007/BF02942007.


Inborn 'errors' of drug metabolism. Pharmacokinetic and clinical implications.

Lennard M, Tucker G, Woods H Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990; 19(4):257-63.

PMID: 2208896 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199019040-00001.


References
1.
Wilcox R, Mitchell J . Contribution of atenolol, bendrofluazide, and hydrallazine to management of severe hypertension. Br Med J. 1977; 2(6086):547-50. PMC: 1631443. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.6086.547. View

2.
Vandenburg M, Wright P, Holmes J, Rogers H, Ahmad R . The hypotensive response to hydralazine, in triple therapy, is not related to acetylator phenotype. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982; 13(5):747-50. PMC: 1402085. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01452.x. View

3.
Zacest R, Koch-Weser J . Relation of hydralazine plasma concentration to dosage and hypotensive action. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1972; 13(3):420-5. DOI: 10.1002/cpt1972133420. View

4.
Ramsay L . Diuretic and beta-blocker in hypertension--then what?. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1980; 14(4):249-53. PMC: 5373247. View

5.
Ludden T, McNay Jr J, Shepherd A, Lin M . Clinical pharmacokinetics of hydralazine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1982; 7(3):185-205. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198207030-00001. View