» Articles » PMID: 6626680

A Master Equation Theory of Fluorescence Induction, Photochemical Yield, and Singlet-triplet Exciton Quenching in Photosynthetic Systems

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 1983 Oct 1
PMID 6626680
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A master equation theory is formulated to describe the dependence of the fluorescence yield (phi) in photosynthetic systems on the number of photons (Y) absorbed per photosynthetic unit (or domain). This theory is applied to the calculation of the dependence of the fluorescence yield on Y in (a) fluorescence induction, and (b) singlet exciton-triplet excited-state quenching experiments. In both cases, the fluorescence yield depends on the number of previously absorbed photons per domain, and thus evolves in a nonlinear manner with increasing Y. In case a, excitons transform the photosynthetic reaction centers from a quenching state to a nonquenching state, or a lower efficiency of quenching state; subsequently, absorbed photons have a higher probability of decaying by radiative pathways and phi increases as Y increases. In case b, ground-state carotenoid molecules are converted to long-lived triplet excited-state quenchers, and phi decreases as Y increases. It is shown that both types of processes are formally described by the same theoretical equations that relate phi to Y. The calculated phi (Y) curves depend on two parameters m and R, where m is the number of reaction centers (or ground-state carotenoid molecules that can be converted to triplets), and R is the ratio phi (Y leads to infinity)/(Y leads to 0). The finiteness of the photosynthetic units is thus taken into account. The m = 1 case corresponds to the "puddle" model, and m leads to infinity to the "lake," or matrix, model. It is shown that the experimental phi (Y) curves for both fluorescence induction and singlet-triplet exciton quenching experiments are better described by the m leads to infinity cases than the m = 1 case.

Citing Articles

Excitation transfer and quenching in photosystem II, enlightened by carotenoid triplet state in leaves.

Laisk A, Peterson R, Oja V Photosynth Res. 2024; 160(1):31-44.

PMID: 38502255 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-024-01086-6.


Time- and reduction-dependent rise of photosystem II fluorescence during microseconds-long inductions in leaves.

Oja V, Laisk A Photosynth Res. 2020; 145(3):209-225.

PMID: 32918663 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-020-00783-2.


Kinetics of photosystem II electron transport: a mathematical analysis based on chlorophyll fluorescence induction.

Laisk A, Oja V Photosynth Res. 2017; 136(1):63-82.

PMID: 28936722 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-017-0439-y.


A comparison between plant photosystem I and photosystem II architecture and functioning.

Caffarri S, Tibiletti T, Jennings R, Santabarbara S Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2014; 15(4):296-331.

PMID: 24678674 PMC: 4030627. DOI: 10.2174/1389203715666140327102218.


The optical cross section and absolute size of a photosynthetic unit.

Mauzerall D Photosynth Res. 2014; 10(3):163-70.

PMID: 24435361 DOI: 10.1007/BF00118279.


References
1.
Murata N, Nishimura M, Takamiya A . Fluorescene of chlorophyll in photosynthetic systems. II. Induction of fluorescence in isolated spinach chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966; 120(1):23-33. DOI: 10.1016/0926-6585(66)90273-1. View

2.
Malkin S, Kok B . Fluorescence induction studies in isolated chloroplasts. I. Number of components involved in the reaction and quantum yields. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966; 126(3):413-32. DOI: 10.1016/0926-6585(66)90001-x. View

3.
Clayton R . An analysis of the relations between fluorescence and photochemistry during photosynthesis. J Theor Biol. 1967; 14(2):173-86. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(67)90112-9. View

4.
Wang R, Myers J . Energy transfer between photosynthetic units analyzed by flash oxygen yield vs. flash intensity. Photochem Photobiol. 1973; 17(5):321-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1973.tb06360.x. View

5.
Joliot P, Bennoun P, Joliot A . New evidence supporting energy transfer between photosynthetic units. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973; 305(2):317-28. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(73)90179-5. View