» Articles » PMID: 6594053

A Cephalometric Analysis of Skeletal and Dental Changes Contributing to Class II Correction in Activator Treatment

Overview
Journal Am J Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 1984 Feb 1
PMID 6594053
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate cephalometrically the mechanism of anteroposterior occlusal changes in activator treatment. The analysis used made it possible to relate alterations in the occlusion to sagittal skeletal and dental changes in the maxilla and mandible. The sample consisted of thirty Class II, Division 1 malocclusion cases treated successfully with activators during an average time period of 32 months. Before- and after-treatment head films in centric occlusion were analyzed. The occlusal line (OL) and occlusal line perpendicular (OLp) through sella were used for reference. Linear measurements were performed parallel to OL. The following results were found: (1) The improvement in occlusal relationships in the molar and incisor segments was about equally a result of skeletal and dental changes. (2) Overjet correction averaging 5.0 mm was a result of 2.4 mm more mandibular growth than maxillary growth, a 2.5 mm distal movement of the maxillary incisors, and a 0.1 mm mesial movement of the mandibular incisors. (3) Class II molar correction averaging 5.1 mm was a result of 2.4 mm more mandibular growth than maxillary growth, a 0.4 mm distal movement of the maxillary molars, and a 2.3 mm mesial movement of the mandibular molars. (4) When the findings were compared with longitudinal records of persons with normal occlusion (Bolton standards), activator treatment seemed to inhibit maxillary growth, move the maxillary incisors and molars distally, and move the mandibular incisors and molars mesially. Mandibular growth appeared not to be affected by activator treatment.

Citing Articles

Precision and accuracy of craniofacial growth and orthodontic treatment evaluation by digital image correlation: a prospective cohort study.

Danz J, Stockli S, Rank C Front Oral Health. 2024; 5:1419481.

PMID: 39130491 PMC: 11310159. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2024.1419481.


Evaluation of the External Soft Tissue Changes Following the Correction of Class II Skeletal Malocclusion in the Adolescence Period Using Removable and Fixed Functional Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Almrayati D, Hajeer M, Almusawi A, Jaber S, Baba M, Ajaj M Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e57070.

PMID: 38545423 PMC: 10972613. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57070.


Assessment of dental, skeletal, and soft tissue changes following mandibular advancement with Invisalign in skeletal Class II.

Al Subaie H, Alturki G, Alsulaimani F, Ghoneim S, Baeshen H Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(1):66-71.

PMID: 38375387 PMC: 10874789. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.09.005.


Efficacy of invisible advancement correction for mandibular retraction in adolescents based on Pancherz analysis.

Kong L, Liu X World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(6):1299-1309.

PMID: 36926124 PMC: 10013113. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i6.1299.


Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances?.

Wu Y, Yu Q, Xia Y, Wang B, Chen S, Gu K BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):65.

PMID: 36732724 PMC: 9896678. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02709-5.