» Articles » PMID: 33961060

Does Daily Wear Time of Twin Block Reliably Predict Its Efficiency of Class II Treatment?

Overview
Journal J Orofac Orthop
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 May 7
PMID 33961060
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate how daily wear time (DWT) influences class II malocclusion treatment efficiency.

Materials And Methods: The study group consisted of 55 patients (mean age 10.4 years) diagnosed with a class II/1 malocclusion. Twin block appliances, with built-in Theramon® microsensors (MC Technology, Hargelsberg, Austria) to monitor patients' cooperation (daily wear time assessment), were used for treatment. Cephalograms were taken and the following initial and final measurements were compared: Co-Gn, Co-Go, Co-Olp, Pg-Olp, WITS, SNA, SNB, ANB, Co-Go-Me, overjet, molar and canine relationships. The Shapiro-Wilk test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Student's t-test, Levene's test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, χ test, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient with p < 0.05 set as the statistical significance level were used to determine the correlation of the outcomes with DWT; a ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve was calculated to illustrate diagnostic ability of the binary classifier system.

Results: DWT was very highly positively correlated with change of the Pg-Olp parameter and highly with an improvement in the ANB, SNA, and SNB angles, an increase in the WITS parameter and an increase in Co-Gn distance. DWTs < 7.5 h correlated with significantly less improvement of the investigated variables. However, DWT > 7.5 h did not significantly correlate with the improvement of the overjet and most of the linear parameters in the mandible. The ROC curve and its AUC (area under curve) allowed the determination of a DWT of 7 h and 48 min to be capable of establishing a class I relationship with 83% probability.

Conclusions: Class II treatment efficiency was influenced by DWT; an 8 h threshold value had an 83% probability of establishing a class I relationship.

Citing Articles

Morphologic predictors of mandibular changes induced by Sander's Bite Jumping Appliance.

DAnto V, Oliva G, Rongo R, Bucci R, Martina S, Franchi L Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024; 28(1):67-74.

PMID: 39180251 PMC: 11701945. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12850.


Patient adherence in orthodontics: a scoping review.

van der Bie R, Bos A, Bruers J, Jonkman R BDJ Open. 2024; 10(1):58.

PMID: 39013856 PMC: 11252357. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-024-00235-2.


Effects of twin-block appliance on upper airway parameters in OSA children with class II malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia: a CBCT study.

Zreaqat M, Hassan R, Samsudin A, Alforaidi S Eur J Pediatr. 2023; 182(12):5501-5510.

PMID: 37777602 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05226-3.


Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Nahajowski M, Lis J, Sarul M Int Dent J. 2022; 72(5):597-606.

PMID: 35961844 PMC: 9485511. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.004.


3D Printed Customized Facemask for Maxillary Protraction in the Early Treatment of a Class III Malocclusion: Proof-of-Concept Clinical Case.

Franchi L, Vichi A, Marti P, Lampus F, Guercio S, Recupero A Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(11).

PMID: 35683044 PMC: 9181288. DOI: 10.3390/ma15113747.


References
1.
Santamaria-Villegas A, Manrique-Hernandez R, Alvarez-Varela E, Restrepo-Serna C . Effect of removable functional appliances on mandibular length in patients with class II with retrognathism: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17(1):52. PMC: 5289049. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0339-8. View

2.
Parekh J, Counihan K, Fleming P, Pandis N, Sharma P . Effectiveness of part-time vs full-time wear protocols of Twin-block appliance on dental and skeletal changes: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155(2):165-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.016. View

3.
Creekmore T, Radney L . Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic?. Am J Orthod. 1983; 83(2):89-108. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(83)90294-4. View

4.
OBrien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S . Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124(2):128-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00345-7. View

5.
Ishaq R, Alhammadi M, Fayed M, El-Ezz A, Mostafa Y . Fixed functional appliances with multibracket appliances have no skeletal effect on the mandible: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149(5):612-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.023. View