» Articles » PMID: 6543244

Effect of Intercalating Agents on RNA Polymerase I Promoter Selection in Xenopus Laevis

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1984 Dec 1
PMID 6543244
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have analyzed the effect of DNA intercalating agents on the transcription signals from two different Xenopus laevis RNA polymerase I promoters. The transcription signal from the promoter for the 7.5-kilobase rRNA precursor (the gene promoter) is unaffected over a large range of intercalating agent concentrations regardless of whether the template is injected plasmid DNA in oocytes, the amplified endogenous nucleoli of oocytes, or the endogenous chromosomes of cultured Xenopus kidney cells. The transcription signal from a closely related promoter located in the spacer DNA between genes (the spacer promoter) ranges between undetectable to equivalent to the gene promoter signal on different templates. The transcription signal from the spacer promoter is also differentially affected by intercalating agents relative to the gene promoter. Depending on the template, these agents can either increase or decrease the transcription signal from the spacer promoter. Fusions between the gene and spacer promoters demonstrate that intercalating agents affect transcription initiation. One explanation for these results is that the degree of supercoiling of the template DNA can differentially inhibit transcription from the spacer promoters. The different effects of intercalating agents on transcription from the spacer promoters of various templates could then be explained as differences in the degree of supercoiling present on these templates initially.

Citing Articles

Inhibition of transcription in eukaryotic cells by X-irradiation: relation to the loss of topological constraint in closed DNA loops.

Luchnik A, Hisamutdinov T, Georgiev G Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16(11):5175-90.

PMID: 3387223 PMC: 336726. DOI: 10.1093/nar/16.11.5175.


In vivo transcription from multiple spacer rRNA gene promoters during early development and evolution of the intergenic spacer in the brine shrimp Artemia.

Koller H, Frondorf K, Maschner P, Vaughn J Nucleic Acids Res. 1987; 15(13):5391-411.

PMID: 3037491 PMC: 305968. DOI: 10.1093/nar/15.13.5391.


Expression of ribosomal insertion in Drosophila: sensitivity to intercalating drugs.

Dawid I, Rebbert M Nucleic Acids Res. 1986; 14(3):1267-77.

PMID: 3005969 PMC: 339502. DOI: 10.1093/nar/14.3.1267.


Eukaryotic type I topoisomerase is enriched in the nucleolus and catalytically active on ribosomal DNA.

Muller M, Pfund W, Mehta V, Trask D EMBO J. 1985; 4(5):1237-43.

PMID: 2988941 PMC: 554330. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03766.x.


A test of 'polymerase handover' as a mechanism for stimulating initiation by RNA polymerase I.

Lucchini R, Reeder R Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17(1):373-87.

PMID: 2911470 PMC: 331556. DOI: 10.1093/nar/17.1.373.


References
1.
Menzel R, Gellert M . Regulation of the genes for E. coli DNA gyrase: homeostatic control of DNA supercoiling. Cell. 1983; 34(1):105-13. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90140-x. View

2.
Wilkinson J, Roan J, Reeder R . Nested control regions promote Xenopus ribosomal RNA synthesis by RNA polymerase I. Cell. 1983; 35(1):199-206. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90222-2. View

3.
Reeder R, Roan J, Dunaway M . Spacer regulation of Xenopus ribosomal gene transcription: competition in oocytes. Cell. 1983; 35(2 Pt 1):449-56. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90178-2. View

4.
Pennock D, Reeder R . In vitro methylation of HpaII sites in Xenopus laevis rDNA does not affect its transcription in oocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984; 12(4):2225-32. PMC: 318653. DOI: 10.1093/nar/12.4.2225. View

5.
Pruitt S, Reeder R . Effect of topological constraint on transcription of ribosomal DNA in Xenopus oocytes. Comparison of plasmid and endogenous genes. J Mol Biol. 1984; 174(1):121-39. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90368-1. View