» Articles » PMID: 6162624

DNA Extraction During Giemsa Differentiation of Chromatids Singly and Doubly Substituted with BrdU

Overview
Journal Chromosoma
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 1981 Jan 1
PMID 6162624
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human lymphocytes were cultured in 3H-labelled BrdU. Cells were pretreated to induce differentiation, autoradiographed and Giemsa-stained. DNA extraction was deduced if grain counts were lower in differentiated mitoses compared with untreated controls.--The differentiation method involved sequential pretreatments with short wave UV and 2 x SSc at 60 degrees C. This removed 34% of label from first division cells (with TB.TB chromosomes) but relatively more (53%) from second division (TB.BB chromosomes). In second division cells, about two thirds of label was lost from pale (BB) chromatids but only one third from dark (TB) chromatids. The UV and SSC pretreatments acted in collaboration, since neither alone reduced grain counts significantly.--On testing other methods, similar preferential DNA extraction was obtained with Perry and Wolff's FPG method, and with the hot salt pretreatment of Korenberg and Freedlender. However, good Giemsa differentiation could also be obtained using Hoechst 33258 and light pretreatments without any DNA loss. Reverse differentiation patterns (TB pale, BB dark) induced by warm acids resulted in extraction of nearly two thirds of 3H-BrdU label, but relative loss was the same from pale and dark chromatin. Direct reverse staining using alkaline Giemsa did not result in any loss of label.--Thus preferential DNA loss from pale stained chromatin underlies differentiation methods using light plus hot salt pretreatments, but it is not obligatory for good differentiation using other techniques.

Citing Articles

Sister chromatid differentiation in 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes: a study with DNA-specific ligands and monoclonal antibody to histone H2B.

Ribas M, Korenberg J, Peretti D, Pichiri G, Stockert J, Gosalvez J Chromosome Res. 1994; 2(6):428-38.

PMID: 7530578 DOI: 10.1007/BF01552865.


Considerations on the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromosomes.

Speit G Hum Genet. 1984; 67(3):264-9.

PMID: 6469241 DOI: 10.1007/BF00291353.


DNA lysis is involved in the simplified fluorescence plus Giemsa method for differential staining of sister chromatids.

Jan K, Yang J, Su P Chromosoma. 1984; 89(1):76-8.

PMID: 6199165 DOI: 10.1007/BF00302354.


On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids.

Gonzalez-Gil G, Navarrete M Chromosoma. 1982; 86(3):375-82.

PMID: 6184205 DOI: 10.1007/BF00292264.


Contradictory differential staining results with Coomassie Brilliant Blue and silver carbonate on sister chromatids.

Jan K, Wen W Experientia. 1982; 38(7):853-4.

PMID: 6179788 DOI: 10.1007/BF01972313.


References
1.
Goto K, Akematsu T, Shimazu H, Sugiyama T . Simple differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids after treatment with photosensitive dyes and exposure to light and the mechanism of staining. Chromosoma. 1975; 53(3):223-30. DOI: 10.1007/BF00329173. View

2.
Lin S, Lin D, Riggs A . Histones bind more tightly to bromodeoxyuridine-substituted DNA than to normal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976; 3(9):2183-91. PMC: 343075. DOI: 10.1093/nar/3.9.2183. View

3.
Lapeyre J, Bekhoe I . Effects of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine and dimethyl sulfoxide on properties and structure of chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1974; 89(1):137-62. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90167-3. View

4.
Korenberg J, Freedlender E . Giemsa technique for the detection of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma. 1974; 48(4):355-60. DOI: 10.1007/BF00290992. View

5.
David J, Gordon J, Rutter W . Increased thermal stability of chromatin containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine-substituted DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974; 71(7):2808-12. PMC: 388561. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2808. View