» Articles » PMID: 38771859

The Active Time Model of Concurrent Choice

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 May 21
PMID 38771859
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The following paper describes a steady-state model of concurrent choice, termed the active time model (ATM). ATM is derived from maximization principles and is characterized by a semi-Markov process. The model proposes that the controlling stimulus in concurrent variable-interval (VI) VI schedules of reinforcement is the time interval since the most recent response, termed here "the active interresponse time" or simply "active time." In the model after a response is generated, it is categorized by a function that relates active times to switch/stay probabilities. In the paper the output of ATM is compared with predictions made by three other models of operant conditioning: melioration, a version of scalar expectancy theory (SET), and momentary maximization. Data sets considered include preferences in multiple-concurrent VI VI schedules, molecular choice patterns, correlations between switching and perseveration, and molar choice proportions. It is shown that ATM can account for all of these data sets, while the other models produce more limited fits. However, rather than argue that ATM is the singular model for concurrent VI VI choice, a consideration of its concept space leads to the conclusion that operant choice is multiply-determined, and that an adaptive viewpoint-one that considers experimental procedures both as selecting mechanisms for animal choice as well as tests of the controlling variables of that choice-is warranted.

References
1.
Platt J . Interresponse-time shaping by variable-interval-like interresponse-time reinforcement contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979; 31(1):3-14. PMC: 1332784. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-3. View

2.
Herrnstein R . Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:267-72. PMC: 1404074. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. View

3.
van Rijn H, Taatgen N . Timing of multiple overlapping intervals: how many clocks do we have?. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008; 129(3):365-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.002. View

4.
MacDonall J . Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005; 84(2):167-83. PMC: 1243978. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.76-04. View

5.
Jensen G, Neuringer A . Choice as a function of reinforcer "hold": from probability learning to concurrent reinforcement. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008; 34(4):437-60. PMC: 2673116. DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.4.437. View