» Articles » PMID: 5645872

Some Determiners of Attention

Overview
Date 1968 Mar 1
PMID 5645872
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three experiments, using a total of 13 pigeons, examined the stimulus control acquired by the separate components of a compound visual stimulus transilluminating the pecking key. Experiment I measured the control acquired by components of compound discriminative stimuli used in discrimination training. Experiment II sought to demonstrate the effect of pretraining a single stimulus discrimination on control acquired by each component in a compound stimulus discrimination. It also investigated the effect of training the compound stimulus discrimination before the single stimulus discrimination. Experiment III sought a continuous stimulus control function when pretraining stimulus intensities were varied. The results suggest that the extent to which a bird "pays attention" to a stimulus, defined in terms of the degree of stimulus control acquired by that stimulus, is determined by how well it previously learned to discriminate that stimulus from other stimuli.

Citing Articles

Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.

Gomes-Ng S, Elliffe D, Cowie S Learn Behav. 2019; 47(3):245-257.

PMID: 31011893 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-019-00381-w.


A descriptive taxonomy of environmental operations and its implications for behavior analysis.

Schlinger Jr H, Blakely E Behav Anal. 2012; 17(1):43-57.

PMID: 22478172 PMC: 2733693. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392652.


Further analysis of picture interference when teaching word recognition to children with autism.

Dittlinger L, Lerman D J Appl Behav Anal. 2011; 44(2):341-9.

PMID: 21709789 PMC: 3120069. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-341.


Discrimination blocking: acquisition versus performance deficits in human contingency learning.

Castro L, Wasserman E Learn Behav. 2007; 35(3):149-62.

PMID: 17918420 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193050.


Blocking the development of stimulus control when stimuli indicate periods of nonreinforcement.

Seraganian P, Vom Saal W J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(5):767-72.

PMID: 16811400 PMC: 1338679. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-767.


References
1.
Reynolds G . Attention in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:203-8. PMC: 1404062. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-203. View

2.
Kelleher R, Gollub L . A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962; 5:543-97. PMC: 1404082. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543. View

3.
Farmer J . PROPERTIES OF BEHAVIOR UNDER RANDOM INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:607-16. PMC: 1404433. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-607. View

4.
LAWRENCE D . Acquired distinctiveness of cues; transfer between discrimination on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. J Exp Psychol. 1949; 39(6):770-84. DOI: 10.1037/h0058097. View

5.
Mackintosh N . THE EFFECT OF ATTENTION ON THE SLOPE OF GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS. Br J Psychol. 1965; 56:87-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1965.tb00948.x. View