» Articles » PMID: 21709789

Further Analysis of Picture Interference when Teaching Word Recognition to Children with Autism

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2011 Jun 29
PMID 21709789
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research indicates that pairing pictures with associated words when teaching sight-word reading may hinder acquisition (e.g., Didden, Prinsen, & Sigafoos, 2000; Singh & Solman, 1990; Solman & Singh, 1992). The purpose of the current study was to determine whether this phenomenon was due to a previously learned association between the spoken word and picture (i.e., blocking) or due to the mere presence of a picture as an extrastimulus prompt (i.e., overshadowing). Three participants were taught to recognize words that were presented alone or paired with pictures that the participants either could or could not identify prior to training. All participants learned the words more quickly when they were presented alone rather than with pictures, regardless of their prior learning history with respect to pictures representing the words. This finding is consistent with the phenomenon of overshadowing. Nonetheless, consistent with blocking, all participants also acquired the words presented alone more quickly if they could not identify the associated pictures prior to training. Together, these findings have important implications for using prompts when teaching skills to individuals with developmental disabilities.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Effects of Compound Stimuli on Stimulus Control during Match-to-Sample Procedures.

Grey H, Morris C, Perrin J, Oliveira J Behav Anal Pract. 2025; 17(4):1211-1215.

PMID: 39790928 PMC: 11707123. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-024-00990-6.


Prediction of Response Patterns during Conditional Discrimination Training across Data Recording Methods.

Platt D, Cariveau T, Ellington P, Brown A Behav Anal Pract. 2023; 16(4):1113-1123.

PMID: 38076750 PMC: 10700256. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00778-0.

References
1.
Lovaas O, Schreibman L, Koegel R, Rehm R . Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input. J Abnorm Psychol. 1971; 77(3):211-22. DOI: 10.1037/h0031015. View

2.
Reynolds G . Attention in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:203-8. PMC: 1404062. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-203. View

3.
Weiss S, Panlilio L . Blocking a selective association in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999; 71(1):13-24. PMC: 1284690. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-13. View

4.
Didden R, Prinsen H, Sigafoos J . The blocking effect of pictorial prompts on sight-word reading. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(3):317-20. PMC: 1284254. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-317. View

5.
Dube W, McIlvane W . Reduction of stimulus overselectivity with nonverbal differential observing responses. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999; 32(1):25-33. PMC: 1284538. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-25. View