» Articles » PMID: 5630381

Cytoplasmic Fractions Associated with Semliki Forest Virus Ribonucleic Acid Replication

Overview
Journal J Virol
Date 1967 Apr 1
PMID 5630381
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When actinomycin D-treated chick fibroblasts were labeled with (3)H-uridine for varying periods during the log phase of Semliki Forest virus infection, radioactivity was found associated with different cytoplasmic fractions. After a 1-min period of labeling, it appeared in a large cytoplasmic structure which was seen in electron micrographs of infected cells. Sediments of sucrose density gradients of cytoplasmic extracts of these cells also contained these structures. Three forms of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) were associated with this cytoplasmic structure: a ribonuclease-sensitive 42S form identical to the RNA of the mature virus, a ribonuclease-sensitive 26S form, and a ribonuclease-resistant 20S form. After a 5- to 10-min labeling period, radioactivity was associated with a ribonuclease-sensitive 65S cytoplasmic fraction which contained only the 26S RNA form. Finally, after a 1-hr labeling period, a 140S ribonuclease-resistant particle was the most prominent radioactive structure in the cytoplasm. This particle contained only 42S viral RNA. Negative-contrast electron micrographs of the 140S particle and the virion demonstrated structural differences between them. The base compositions of the 42S and 26S viral RNA forms were not significantly different. The base composition of the 20S form differed significantly from that of the other two viral RNA forms, but the values obtained for the mole fractions of the bases present in the 20S form differed, and depended on the period during the virus growth cycle in which (32)P was present. These results suggested that viral RNA originated in the large cytoplasmic body. The 20S RNA appeared to be a structure engaged in viral RNA replication and the 140S particle appeared to be a virus precursor.

Citing Articles

A Novel Mechanism Underlying the Innate Immune Response Induction upon Viral-Dependent Replication of Host Cell mRNA: A Mistake of +sRNA Viruses' Replicases.

Delgui L, Colombo M Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017; 7:5.

PMID: 28164038 PMC: 5247633. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00005.


Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-, actin-, and microtubule-dependent transport of Semliki Forest Virus replication complexes from the plasma membrane to modified lysosomes.

Spuul P, Balistreri G, Kaariainen L, Ahola T J Virol. 2010; 84(15):7543-57.

PMID: 20484502 PMC: 2897599. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00477-10.


Inhibition of arbovirus assembly by cycloheximide.

Friedman R, Grimley P J Virol. 1969; 4(3):292-9.

PMID: 16789106 PMC: 375871. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.4.3.292-299.1969.


Morphogenesis of aura virus.

LASCANO E, Berria M, Oro J J Virol. 1969; 4(3):271-82.

PMID: 16789104 PMC: 375869. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.4.3.271-282.1969.


Functions of alphavirus nonstructural proteins in RNA replication.

Kaariainen L, Ahola T Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2002; 71:187-222.

PMID: 12102555 PMC: 7133189. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6603(02)71044-1.


References
1.
Kelly R, Gould J, SINSHEIMER R . THE REPLICATION OF BACTERIOPHAGE MS2. IV. RNA COMPONENTS SPECIFICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH INFECTION. J Mol Biol. 1965; 11:562-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80011-0. View

2.
Martin R, Ames B . A method for determining the sedimentation behavior of enzymes: application to protein mixtures. J Biol Chem. 1961; 236:1372-9. View

3.
Joklik W, Becker Y . Studies on the genesis of polyribosomes. II. The association of nascent messenger RNA with the 40 S subribosomal particle. J Mol Biol. 1965; 13(2):511-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80113-9. View

4.
Taylor J . STUDIES ON THE MECHANISM OF ACTION OF INTERFERON. I. INTERFERON ACTION AND RNA SYNTHESIS IN CHICK EMBRYO FIBROBLASTS INFECTED WITH SEMLIKI FOREST VIRUS. Virology. 1965; 25:340-9. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(65)90053-x. View

5.
Erikson R, Fenwick M, Franklin R . REPLICATION OF BACTERIOPHAGE RNA: STUDIES ON THE FATE OF PARENTAL RNA. J Mol Biol. 1964; 10:519-29. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80070-x. View