Microfilament Bundles and Cell Shape Are Related to Adhesiveness to Substratum and Are Dissociable from Growth Control in Cultured Fibroblasts
Overview
Affiliations
The distribution of microfilament bundles in cells was examined using antibodies to fibroblast myosin and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. There is no correlation between the presence of bundles of microfilaments and normal growth control. A normal cell line (Balb/c 3T3) cultured on a poorly adhesive substratum showed no microfilament bundles. Similarly, a mutant cell line (AD6) with normal growth, but a rounded shape due to defective adhesiveness to substratum, showed no bundle formation. On the other hand, two transformed cell lines with a flat morphology (Swiss SV3T3 and Balb MSV-85) showed extensive bundle formation. When a transformed cell line with poor adhesiveness (MC5-5) was treated with CSP (a major surface glycoprotein of normal cells) which increases adhesiveness to substratum, the cells formed extensive microfilament bundles without any decrease in growth. We conclude that the distribution of microfilament bundles is related to adhesiveness to substratum and cell shape but not to growth properties.
Topographical influence of electrospun basement membrane mimics on formation of cellular monolayer.
Jain P, Rimal R, Moller M, Singh S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8382.
PMID: 37225757 PMC: 10209110. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34934-x.
Kemp Jr J, Brieher W J Biol Chem. 2018; 293(37):14520-14533.
PMID: 30049798 PMC: 6139541. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004345.
The emergence of integrins: a personal and historical perspective.
Hynes R Matrix Biol. 2004; 23(6):333-40.
PMID: 15533754 PMC: 3493146. DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2004.08.001.
Nagano N, Aoyagi M, Hirakawa K, Yamamoto M, Yamamoto K J Neurooncol. 1996; 27(3):215-24.
PMID: 8847554 DOI: 10.1007/BF00165477.
Brown M, Loew L J Cell Biol. 1994; 127(1):117-28.
PMID: 7929557 PMC: 2120190. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.127.1.117.