» Articles » PMID: 8341872

Velocity Specificity of Resistance Training

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1993 Jun 1
PMID 8341872
Citations 129
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Velocity specificity of resistance training has demonstrated that the greatest strength gains occur at or near the training velocity. There is also evidence that the intent to make a high speed contraction may be the most crucial factor in velocity specificity. The mechanisms underlying the velocity-specific training effect may reside in both neural and muscular components. Muscular adaptations such as hypertrophy may inhibit high velocity strength adaptations due to changes in muscle architecture. However, some studies have reported velocity-specific contractile property adaptations suggesting changes in muscle kinetics. There is evidence to suggest velocity-specific electromyographic (EMG) adaptations with explosive jump training. Other researchers have hypothesised neural adaptations because of a lack of electrically evoked changes in relation to significant voluntary improvements. These neural adaptations may include the selective activation of motor units and/or muscles, especially with high velocity alternating contractions. Although the incidence of motor unit synchronisation increases with training, its contribution to velocity-specific strength gains is unclear. However, increased synchronisation may occur more frequently with the premovement silent period before ballistic contractions. The preprogrammed neural circuitry of ballistic contractions suggests that high velocity training adaptations may involve significant neural adaptations. The unique firing frequency associated with ballistic contractions would suggest possible adaptations in the frequency of motor unit discharge. Although co-contraction of antagonists increases with training and high velocity movement, its contribution is probably related more to joint protection than the velocity-specific training effect.

Citing Articles

Effects of neuromuscular versus stretching training performed during the warm-up on measures of physical fitness and mental well-being in highly-trained pubertal male soccer players.

Hammami A, Selmi W, Mahmoudi A, Negra Y, Chaouachi A, Behm D PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318318.

PMID: 39982921 PMC: 11844867. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318318.


Conceptualizing a load and volume autoregulation integrated velocity model to minimize neuromuscular fatigue and maximize neuromuscular adaptations in resistance training.

Hickmott L, Butcher S, Chilibeck P Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39864040 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-025-05709-1.


Effects of 6 weeks of complex training on athletic performance and post-activation performance enhancement effect magnitude in soccer players: a cross-sectional randomized study.

Krzysztofik M, Jarosz J, Urbanski R, Aschenbrenner P, Stastny P Biol Sport. 2025; 42(1):211-221.

PMID: 39758167 PMC: 11694194. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.139849.


Evaluating a 14-week neck strengthening protocol for neuromuscular indicators associated with head and neck trauma.

Schroeder L, Tyndall M, McDaniel A, Wang Y, Kale J Sports Med Health Sci. 2024; 7(1):61-67.

PMID: 39649794 PMC: 11624327. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.04.002.


Can isometric testing substitute for the one repetition maximum squat test?.

Warneke K, Keiner M, Behm D, Wirth K, Kaufmann M, Sproll M Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(12):3683-3692.

PMID: 39098977 PMC: 11568971. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05554-8.


References
1.
Thorstensson A, Karlsson J, Viitasalo J, Luhtanen P, Komi P . Effect of strength training on EMG of human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976; 98(2):232-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb00241.x. View

2.
GRIMBY L, Hannerz J, Hedman B . Contraction time and voluntary discharge properties of individual short toe extensor motor units in man. J Physiol. 1979; 289:191-201. PMC: 1281365. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012732. View

3.
Watson T, Whitelaw W . Voluntary hyperventilation changes recruitment order of parasternal intercostal motor units. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987; 62(1):187-93. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.1.187. View

4.
Garnett R, Stephens J . Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man. J Physiol. 1981; 311:463-73. PMC: 1275423. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013598. View

5.
Cooke J, Brown S . Movement-related phasic muscle activation. II. Generation and functional role of the triphasic pattern. J Neurophysiol. 1990; 63(3):465-72. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.63.3.465. View