» Articles » PMID: 5058960

Dual Sensitivities of Cells in Wolf Spider Eyes at Ultraviolet and Visible Wavelengths of Light

Overview
Journal J Gen Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1972 Mar 1
PMID 5058960
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intracellular recordings have been made from visual cells in principal and secondary eyes of in vitro wolf spider preparations. The responses of all cells to all wavelengths of light were graded depolarizations; no hyperpolarizations or nerve discharges were seen. Cells in a secondary eye, the anterior lateral eye, had a maximum sensitivity in the visible at 510 nm and a secondary maximum, or shoulder, of sensitivity in the near ultraviolet at 380 nm. Cells in principal eyes, the anterior median eyes, all responded maximally both in the visible at 510 nm and in the ultraviolet at 360-370 nm or less. However, there was no typical ratio of ultraviolet to visible sensitivities; the differences in log sensitivities (log UV/VIS) varied from 3.3 to -0.5. Each principal eye had a population of cells with different ratios. These populations varied with the time of the year, possibly due to changes in light upon the animals. Chromatic adaptations of cells in anterior median (but not anterior lateral) eyes resulted in small, selective changes in spectral sensitivities, and there was some facilitation of responses from cells repeatedly stimulated. It is concluded that cells of secondary eyes contain only a visual pigment absorbing maximally in the visible, while cells of principal eyes probably contain variable amounts of both this pigment and one absorbing in the ultraviolet as well.

Citing Articles

Sister species diverge in modality-specific courtship signal form and function.

Hebets E, Bern M, McGinley R, Roberts A, Kershenbaum A, Starrett J Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(2):852-871.

PMID: 33520171 PMC: 7820158. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7089.


Ant-like Traits in Wingless Parasitoids Repel Attack from Wolf Spiders.

Harvey J, Visser B, Lammers M, Marien J, Gershenzon J, Ode P J Chem Ecol. 2018; 44(10):894-904.

PMID: 30066038 PMC: 6153775. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-018-0989-2.


Seasonal variations in body melanism and size of the wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae).

Yang J, Wu Q, Xiao R, Zhao J, Chen J, Jiao X Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(8):4352-4359.

PMID: 29721303 PMC: 5916282. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3988.


Opsin co-expression in Limulus photoreceptors: differential regulation by light and a circadian clock.

Katti C, Kempler K, Porter M, Legg A, Gonzalez R, Garcia-Rivera E J Exp Biol. 2010; 213(Pt 15):2589-601.

PMID: 20639420 PMC: 2905303. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.043869.


Neural organization of the median ocellus of the dragonfly. I. Intracellular electrical activity.

Chappell R, Dowling J J Gen Physiol. 1972; 60(2):121-47.

PMID: 5049075 PMC: 2226066. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.60.2.121.


References
1.
Rathmayer W . NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION IN A SPIDER AND THE EFFECT OF CALCIUM. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1965; 14:673-87. DOI: 10.1016/0010-406x(65)90254-9. View

2.
Bridges C . Variability and relationships of fish visual pigments. Vision Res. 1966; 5(5):239-51. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(65)90002-7. View

3.
Ruck P, JAHN T . Electrical studies on the compound eye of Ligia occidentalis Dana (Crustacea: Isopoda). J Gen Physiol. 1954; 37(6):825-49. PMC: 2147463. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.37.6.825. View

4.
DARTNALL H . The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. Br Med Bull. 1953; 9(1):24-30. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a074302. View

5.
Hamdorf K, Schwemer J, Gogala M . Insect visual pigment sensitive to ultraviolet light. Nature. 1971; 231(5303):458-9. DOI: 10.1038/231458a0. View