» Articles » PMID: 488082

Perception of Effort in Isometric and Dynamic Muscular Contraction

Overview
Date 1979 Jul 2
PMID 488082
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The perception of muscular effort was studied using estimation and production methods in the adductor pollicis and quadriceps. A psychometric scale (percentage magnitude) was used. Static contractions were studied in the adductor pollicis, and both dynamic (isokinetic) and static contractions were studied in quadriceps. Linear and logarithmic equations were fitted for the perceived effort as a percentage of the maximum in relation to the produced percentage maximal force or torque. The logarithmic exponent was around or above 1.0. No significant difference was found between mean exponent and intercept values for the adductor pollicis and the quadriceps, or when estimated or produced values for the two muscles were compared. There was no difference in the same subjects between the equations for static and dynamic contractions with low angular velocity of the quadriceps.

Citing Articles

Supervision During Strength Training-the Interplay with Facilitation, Feedback and Attentional Focus: A Narrative Review.

Fisher J Sports Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40045102 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-025-02192-8.


Relationship between intended force and actual force: comparison between athletes and non-athletes.

Rizzato A, Cantarella G, Basso E, Paoli A, Rotundo L, Bisiacchi P PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17156.

PMID: 38584935 PMC: 10998631. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17156.


Effect of gravity and microgravity on intracranial pressure.

Lawley J, Petersen L, Howden E, Sarma S, Cornwell W, Zhang R J Physiol. 2017; 595(6):2115-2127.

PMID: 28092926 PMC: 5350445. DOI: 10.1113/JP273557.


Relationship between Respiratory Load Perception and Perception of Nonrespiratory Sensory Modalities in Subjects with Life-Threatening Asthma.

Davenport K, Huang C, Davenport M, Davenport P Pulm Med. 2012; 2012:310672.

PMID: 22745905 PMC: 3382357. DOI: 10.1155/2012/310672.


The effect of arm abduction angle and contraction intensity on perceived exertion.

Timmons M, Stevens S, Pincivero D Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009; 106(1):79-86.

PMID: 19184084 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-0992-y.


References
1.
GRANIT R . Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement. Brain. 1972; 95(4):451-60. DOI: 10.1093/brain/95.4.649. View

2.
EDWARDS R, Young A, Hosking G, Jones D . Human skeletal muscle function: description of tests and normal values. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1977; 52(3):283-90. DOI: 10.1042/cs0520283. View

3.
Thorstensson A, Grimby G, Karlsson J . Force-velocity relations and fiber composition in human knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol. 1976; 40(1):12-6. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1976.40.1.12. View

4.
Borg G . Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970; 2(2):92-8. View

5.
Gandevia S, McCloskey D . Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle finger. J Physiol. 1976; 260(2):387-407. PMC: 1309097. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011521. View