» Articles » PMID: 2065753

Changes in Perceived Finger Force Produced by Muscular Contractions Under Isometric and Anisometric Conditions

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1991 Jan 1
PMID 2065753
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compared matching of finger forces under isometric conditions with matching of forces produced against a spring load (anisometric conditions) in twenty normal subjects. The instruction was to generate the same force in both hands holding a grip between thumb and index finger in each hand. Visual feedback indicating the target force and the actual force applied were presented for one (reference) hand only. The forces produced in each hand were measured continuously during matching trials. A special device provided the opportunity to change from isometric to anisometric force production. Matching was required under symmetric conditions, in which force was generated in both hands either isometrically or anisometrically, as well as under asymmetric conditions in which isometric force has to be matched to anisometric force or the reverse. Under symmetric conditions matching error was consistently smaller in anisometric than in isometric force production. However, the striking feature was a severe mismatch between hands when forces had to be produced differently. For most subjects, a force generated against the spring load in the reference hand was greatly overestimated by the matching hand working isometrically. For the reverse condition consistent underestimations were observed. This effect cannot be attributed to left/right differences or a simple confusion of subjects in the asymmetric tasks. Some of the factors confounded with the conditions of force production were ruled out as an explanation by additional experimental controls. The mismatch neither depends on signals related to different finger positions associated with target forces nor is it alleviated when differently produced forces are matched sequentially.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force.

Jones L, Piateski E Exp Brain Res. 2005; 168(1-2):298-302.

PMID: 16307250 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0259-8.


Perception of non-voluntary brief contractions in normal subjects and in a deafferented patient.

Nicolas G, Marchand-Pauvert V, Lasserre V, Guihenneuc-Jovyaux C, Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Jami L Exp Brain Res. 2004; 161(2):166-79.

PMID: 15551086 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2056-1.


Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces.

Jones L Exp Brain Res. 2003; 151(2):197-203.

PMID: 12768260 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1434-4.


Influence of afferent feedback on isometric fine force resolution in humans.

Henningsen H, Knecht S Exp Brain Res. 1997; 113(2):207-13.

PMID: 9063707 DOI: 10.1007/BF02450319.


Pinch force matching errors predicted by an equilibrium-point model.

Van Doren C Exp Brain Res. 1995; 106(3):488-92.

PMID: 8983993 DOI: 10.1007/BF00231072.


References
1.
Gandevia S, McCloskey D . Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man. J Physiol. 1977; 272(3):673-89. PMC: 1353648. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012066. View

2.
Garnett R, Stephens J . Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man. J Physiol. 1981; 311:463-73. PMC: 1275423. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013598. View

3.
Johansson R, Westling G . Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 71(1):72-86. DOI: 10.1007/BF00247523. View

4.
Aniss A, Gandevia S, Milne R . Changes in perceived heaviness and motor commands produced by cutaneous reflexes in man. J Physiol. 1988; 397:113-26. PMC: 1192115. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp016991. View

5.
Gandevia S . The perception of motor commands or effort during muscular paralysis. Brain. 1982; 105(Pt 1):151-9. DOI: 10.1093/brain/105.1.151. View