Taya S, Pasqualotto A
Iperception. 2025; 16(1):20416695251319270.
PMID: 40026673
PMC: 11869244.
DOI: 10.1177/20416695251319270.
Wu Y, Li S
J Neurosci. 2024; 44(27).
PMID: 38777600
PMC: 11223457.
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1175-23.2024.
Beitner J, Helbing J, Draschkow D, David E, Vo M
J Eye Mov Res. 2023; 15(3).
PMID: 37215533
PMC: 10195094.
DOI: 10.16910/jemr.15.3.5.
Matthews N, Folivi F
PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0282146.
PMID: 36827285
PMC: 9955962.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282146.
Kosovicheva A, Bex P
Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):11520.
PMID: 34075169
PMC: 8169838.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91006-8.
Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield.
Gayet S, Van der Stigchel S, Paffen C
Front Psychol. 2014; 5:460.
PMID: 24904476
PMC: 4033185.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00460.
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.
Wolfe J
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 1(2):202-38.
PMID: 24203471
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200774.
Explaining the face-inversion effect: the face-scheme incompatibility (FSI) model.
Rakover S
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 20(4):665-92.
PMID: 23381811
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0388-1.
Young children's representations of spatial and functional relations between objects.
Shutts K, Ornkloo H, von Hofsten C, Keen R, Spelke E
Child Dev. 2009; 80(6):1612-27.
PMID: 19930341
PMC: 4142772.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01357.x.
Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise.
New J, Cosmides L, Tooby J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(42):16598-603.
PMID: 17909181
PMC: 2034212.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703913104.
Are first impressions lasting impressions? An exploration of the generality of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions.
Miller J, Westerman D, Lloyd M
Mem Cognit. 2005; 32(8):1305-15.
PMID: 15900924
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206321.
Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces.
Little A, Jones B
Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1526):1759-63.
PMID: 12964976
PMC: 1691445.
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2445.
The use of word-picture verification to study entry-level object recognition: further support for view-invariant mechanisms.
DeCaro S, Reeves A
Mem Cognit. 2002; 30(5):811-21.
PMID: 12219897
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196436.
The influence of stimulus orientation on the vertex positive scalp potential evoked by faces.
Jeffreys D
Exp Brain Res. 1993; 96(1):163-72.
PMID: 8243578
DOI: 10.1007/BF00230449.
Feature frequency in concept learning: What is counted?.
Kellogg R
Mem Cognit. 1981; 9(2):157-63.
PMID: 7242329
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202330.
The time to name disoriented natural objects.
Jolicoeur P
Mem Cognit. 1985; 13(4):289-303.
PMID: 4079746
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202498.
The perception of speaking rate using visual information from a talker's face.
Green K
Percept Psychophys. 1987; 42(6):587-93.
PMID: 3696953
DOI: 10.3758/bf03207990.
A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape.
Jolicoeur P
Mem Cognit. 1987; 15(6):531-43.
PMID: 3695948
DOI: 10.3758/bf03198388.
Mental rotation of faces.
Valentine T, Bruce V
Mem Cognit. 1988; 16(6):556-66.
PMID: 3193887
DOI: 10.3758/bf03197057.
The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections.
McMullen P, Jolicoeur P
Mem Cognit. 1990; 18(1):99-115.
PMID: 2314233
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202650.
