» Articles » PMID: 38777600

Complexity Matters: Normalization to Prototypical Viewpoint Induces Memory Distortion Along the Vertical Axis of Scenes

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 May 22
PMID 38777600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scene memory is prone to systematic distortions potentially arising from experience with the external world. Boundary transformation, a well-known memory distortion effect along the near-far axis of the three-dimensional space, represents the observer's erroneous recall of scenes' viewing distance. Researchers argued that normalization to the prototypical viewpoint with the high-probability viewing distance influenced this phenomenon. Herein, we hypothesized that the prototypical viewpoint also exists in the vertical angle of view (AOV) dimension and could cause memory distortion along scenes' vertical axis. Human subjects of both sexes were recruited to test this hypothesis, and two behavioral experiments were conducted, revealing a systematic memory distortion in the vertical AOV in both the forced choice ( = 79) and free adjustment ( = 30) tasks. Furthermore, the regression analysis implied that the complexity information asymmetry in scenes' vertical axis and the independent subjective AOV ratings from a large set of online participants ( = 1,208) could jointly predict AOV biases. Furthermore, in a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment ( = 24), we demonstrated the involvement of areas in the ventral visual pathway (V3/V4, PPA, and OPA) in AOV bias judgment. Additionally, in a magnetoencephalography experiment ( = 20), we could significantly decode the subjects' AOV bias judgments ∼140 ms after scene onset and the low-level visual complexity information around the similar temporal interval. These findings suggest that AOV bias is driven by the normalization process and associated with the neural activities in the early stage of scene processing.

Citing Articles

Spatial frequency preferences of representations of indoor and natural scene categories in scene-selective regions under different conditions of contrast.

Zhang Y, Miao Q, Liu B Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1534588.

PMID: 39991751 PMC: 11842314. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1534588.

References
1.
Julian J, Keinath A, Marchette S, Epstein R . The Neurocognitive Basis of Spatial Reorientation. Curr Biol. 2018; 28(17):R1059-R1073. PMC: 6161705. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.057. View

2.
Smith S, Nichols T . Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(1):83-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061. View

3.
Greene M . Statistics of high-level scene context. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:777. PMC: 3810604. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00777. View

4.
Hemmer P, Steyvers M . A Bayesian account of reconstructive memory. Top Cogn Sci. 2014; 1(1):189-202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01010.x. View

5.
Bainbridge W, Baker C . Boundaries Extend and Contract in Scene Memory Depending on Image Properties. Curr Biol. 2020; 30(3):537-543.e3. PMC: 7187786. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.004. View