» Articles » PMID: 4633612

A Meiotic Mutant Defective in Distributive Disjunction in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1973 Mar 1
PMID 4633612
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The female meiotic mutant no distributive disjunction (symbol: nod) reduces the probability that a nonexchange chromosome will disjoin from either a nonexchange homolog or a nonhomolog; the mutant does not affect exchange or the disjunction of bivalents that have undergone exchange. Disjunction of nonexchange homologs was examined for all chromosome pairs; nonhomologous disjunction of the X chromosomes from the Y chromosome in XXY females, of compound chromosomes in females bearing attached-third chromosomes with and without a Y chromosome, and of the second chromosomes from the third chromosomes were also examined. The results suggest that the defect in nod is in the distributive pairing process. The frequencies and patterns of disjunction from a trivalent in nod females suggest that the distributive pairing process involves three separate events-pairing, orientation, and disjunction. The mutant nod appears to affect disjunction only.

Citing Articles

The passing of the last oracle: Adelaide Carpenter and Drosophila meiosis.

Hawley R, Salz H, McKim K, Sekelsky J Chromosoma. 2024; 133(4):247-251.

PMID: 39325143 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-024-00825-x.


piRNA-mediated gene regulation and adaptation to sex-specific transposon expression in male germline.

Chen P, Kotov A, Godneeva B, Bazylev S, Olenina L, Aravin A Genes Dev. 2021; 35(11-12):914-935.

PMID: 33985970 PMC: 8168559. DOI: 10.1101/gad.345041.120.


The functions of kinesin and kinesin-related proteins in eukaryotes.

Ali I, Yang W Cell Adh Migr. 2020; 14(1):139-152.

PMID: 32842864 PMC: 7513868. DOI: 10.1080/19336918.2020.1810939.


Shugoshin protects centromere pairing and promotes segregation of nonexchange partner chromosomes in meiosis.

de Almeida L, Evatt J, Chuong H, Kurdzo E, Eyster C, Gladstone M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(19):9417-9422.

PMID: 31019073 PMC: 6511000. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902526116.


Site-specific transgenesis of the Drosophila melanogaster Y-chromosome using CRISPR/Cas9.

Buchman A, Akbari O Insect Mol Biol. 2018; 28(1):65-73.

PMID: 30079589 PMC: 8459378. DOI: 10.1111/imb.12528.


References
1.
Cooper K, Zimmering S, Krivshenko J . INTERCHROMOSOMAL EFFECTS AND SEGREGATION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955; 41(11):911-4. PMC: 534303. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.41.11.911. View

2.
Weinstein A . The Theory of Multiple-Strand Crossing over. Genetics. 1936; 21(3):155-99. PMC: 1208669. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/21.3.155. View

3.
Baker B, Carpenter A . Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophilia melanogaster. Genetics. 1972; 71(2):255-86. PMC: 1212782. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/71.2.255. View

4.
Grell R, Grell E . THE BEHAVIOR OF NONHOMOLOGOUS CHROMOSOMAL ELEMENTS INVOLVED IN NONRANDOM ASSORTMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1960; 46(1):51-7. PMC: 285014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.46.1.51. View

5.
Baldwin M, Chovnick A . Autosomal half-tetrad analysis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1967; 55(2):277-93. PMC: 1211386. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/55.2.277. View