» Articles » PMID: 4623852

Microspectrophotometry of Arthropod Visual Screening Pigments

Overview
Journal J Gen Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1972 May 1
PMID 4623852
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Absorption spectra of visual screening pigments obtained in vitro with a microspectrophotometer using frozen sections are given for the insects Musca domestica, Phormia regina, Libellula luctuosa, Apis mellifera (worker honeybee only), Drosophila melanogaster (wild type only) and the arachnids Lycosa baltimoriana and Lycosa miami. The spectral range covered is 260-700 nm for Lycosa and Drosophila and 310-700 nm for the remainder of the arthropods. A complete description of the instrumentation is given. For the flies, Phormia and Musca, light absorption by the yellow and red pigments is high from 310 to about 610 nm. This implies that for these insects there should be no wavelength shift in electroretinogram (ERG) results due to light leakage among neighboring ommatidia for this wavelength range. The same comment applies to Calliphora erythrocephala, which is known to have similar screening pigments. For some of the insects studied a close correspondence is noted between screening pigment absorption spectra and spectral sensitivity curves for individual photoreceptors, available in the literature. In some cases the screening pigment absorption spectra can be related to chemical extraction results, with the general observation that some of the in vitro absorption peaks are shifted to the red. The Lycosa, Apis, and Libellula dark red pigments absorb strongly over a wide spectral range and therefore prevent chemical identification.

Citing Articles

Flower Mimics Roll Out Multicolored Carpets to Lure and Kill the House Fly.

Dieng H, Satho T, Mohd Radzi N, Abang F, A Kassim N, Zuharah W Insects. 2021; 12(12).

PMID: 34940185 PMC: 8706000. DOI: 10.3390/insects12121097.


The spectral sensitivity of Drosophila photoreceptors.

Sharkey C, Blanco J, Leibowitz M, Pinto-Benito D, Wardill T Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):18242.

PMID: 33106518 PMC: 7588446. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74742-1.


A semi-automatic and quantitative method to evaluate behavioral photosensitivity in animals based on the optomotor response (OMR).

Matsuo M, Ando Y, Kamei Y, Fukamachi S Biol Open. 2018; 7(6).

PMID: 29921705 PMC: 6031347. DOI: 10.1242/bio.033175.


Functional interplay of visual, sensitizing and screening pigments in the eyes of Drosophila and other red-eyed dipteran flies.

Stavenga D, Wehling M, Belusic G J Physiol. 2017; 595(16):5481-5494.

PMID: 28295348 PMC: 5556166. DOI: 10.1113/JP273674.


PDA (prolonged depolarizing afterpotential)-defective mutants: the story of nina's and ina's--pinta and santa maria, too.

Pak W, Shino S, Leung H J Neurogenet. 2012; 26(2):216-37.

PMID: 22283778 PMC: 3433705. DOI: 10.3109/01677063.2011.642430.


References
1.
Devoe R, Small R, Zvargulis J . Spectral sensitivities of wolf spider eyes. J Gen Physiol. 1969; 54(1):1-32. PMC: 2225900. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.54.1.1. View

2.
Goldsmith T . The nature of the retinal action potential, and the spectral sensitivities of ultraviolet and green receptor systems of the compound eye of the worker honey-bee. J Gen Physiol. 1960; 43:775-99. PMC: 2195024. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.43.4.775. View

3.
Ruck P . The Components of the Visual System of a Dragonfly. J Gen Physiol. 2009; 49(2):289-307. PMC: 2195487. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.49.2.289. View

4.
BUTENANDT A, BIEKERT E, LINZEN B . [Ommochromes. XIV. Distribution of ommins in animal kingdom]. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1958; 313:251-8. DOI: 10.1515/bchm2.1958.313.1.251. View

5.
Goldsmith T, Fernandez H . The sensitivity of housefly photoreceptors in the mid-ultraviolet and the limits of the visible spectrum. J Exp Biol. 1968; 49(3):669-77. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.49.3.669. View