Unimportance of Counterflux in the Energetics of "downhill" Transport

Adam Kepes suggested that the cellular transport and hydrolysis of orthonitrophenyl-beta-d-galactopyranoside is powered by the counterflux of the d-galactose resulting from beta-galactosidase action within the cell. His explanation would rationalize the unique insensitivity of this galactoside transport to energy poisons such as azide. But contrary to the predictions of this hypothesis, (i) there is no initial large inhibition that progressively lessens as galactose is produced. This was shown with a double wavelength stopped-flow spectrophotometer developed to eliminate interference from turbidity transients. (ii) The azide sensitivity does not increase with an external concentration of galactose sufficient to reverse the thermodynamic gradient. (iii) Mutation in galactose utilization or growth on highly catabolite-repressing regimens did not increase the azide sensitivity, and induction of galactose transport and metabolism did not decrease azide sensitivity. It was found that Kepes measurements must have contained two artifacts. One is that the control rate of hydrolysis decreases with time as the dense cell suspension becomes anaerobic. The other is that azide causes turbidity changes for some time after its introduction. If the former is avoided by magnetic stirring and the latter by double wavelength spectrophotometry or controls without substrate, the inhibition is constant from the earliest time that can be measured. It is therefore concluded that energy-unstarved cells, exposed to azide, still have adequate energy reserves to couple to the downhill transport, although their potential is not adequate to drive accumulation against a concentration gradient.