» Articles » PMID: 4539414

Report of the 1966-67 Cholera Vaccine Trial in Rural East Pakistan

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 1972 Jan 1
PMID 4539414
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A controlled cholera vaccine field trial was carried out in rural East Pakistan to determine the efficacy of a cholera vaccine of average antigenic potency when used in a continuing programme with annual reimmunizations. A cohort of 40 000 children aged 0-14 years was equally divided into a control group and 3 vaccine groups. Inoculations of vaccine were given annually for 3 years just before the start of the cholera season, and follow-up continued for 2 additional years. The results indicate that there was increasing protection with reimmunization, reaching a maximum with 3 doses. One dose produced 43% protection, 2 doses 64%, 3 doses 81%, and 4 doses 76%. Protection was more sustained after reimmunization; being 50% and 39%, 1 and 2 years after the fourth injection, respectively. Serological surveys suggested a general parallel in the antibody response to vaccine and the level of protection achieved; however, the levels of vibriocidal antibody titres could not be related directly to levels of protection. The overall protection achieved with the 3-year programme of annual reimmunizations was 55% for the group receiving one inoculation annually, and 65% for the group receiving 2 inoculations in the first year followed by annual reimmunizations. When the costs and effectiveness of annual vaccine programmes are compared with those for cholera treatment centres, it becomes clear that the cholera vaccines now available are not appropriate alternatives to treatment in routine cholera control programmes.

Citing Articles

Taking science to cholera in Bangladesh: the personal odyssey of Dr William B Greenough III and his colleagues.

Greenough Iii W, Shababi N, Nourmohammadi Abadchi S eGastroenterology. 2025; 1(1):e000002.

PMID: 39944251 PMC: 11770424. DOI: 10.1136/egastro-2023-000002.


Vaccines against human diarrheal pathogens: current status and perspectives.

Bohles N, Busch K, Hensel M Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014; 10(6):1522-35.

PMID: 24861668 PMC: 5396248. DOI: 10.4161/hv.29241.


Oral vaccines for preventing cholera.

Sinclair D, Abba K, Zaman K, Qadri F, Graves P Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (3):CD008603.

PMID: 21412922 PMC: 6532691. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008603.pub2.


Vaccines for preventing cholera: killed whole cell or other subunit vaccines (injected).

Graves P, Deeks J, Demicheli V, Jefferson T Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (8):CD000974.

PMID: 20687062 PMC: 6532721. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000974.pub2.


Duration of protective immunity conferred by maternal tetanus toxoid immunization: further evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh.

Koenig M, Roy N, McElrath T, Shahidullah M, Wojtyniak B Am J Public Health. 1998; 88(6):903-7.

PMID: 9618617 PMC: 1508215. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.903.


References
1.
BENENSON A, Saad A, Mosley W . Serological studies in cholera. 2. The vibriocidal antibody response of cholera patients determined by a microtechnique. Bull World Health Organ. 1968; 38(2):277-85. PMC: 2554323. View

2.
Mosley W, BENENSON A, Barui R . A serological survey for cholear antibodies in rural east Pakistan. 1. The distribution of antibody in the control population of a cholera-vaccine field-trial area and the relation of antibody titre to the pattern of endemic cholera. Bull World Health Organ. 1968; 38(3):327-34. PMC: 2554484. View

3.
BENENSON A, Mosley W, FAHIMUDDIN M, OSEASOHN R . Cholera vaccine field trials in east Pakistan. 2. Effectiveness in the field. Bull World Health Organ. 1968; 38(3):359-72. PMC: 2554494. View

4.
Gangarosa E, DeWitt W, Feeley J, Adams M . Significance of vibriocidal antibodies with regard to immunity to cholera. J Infect Dis. 1970; 121:Suppl 121:36+. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/121.supplement.s36. View

5.
Cash R, Nalin D, Rochat R, Reller L, Haque Z, Rahman A . A clinical trial of oral therapy in a rural cholera-treatment center. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1970; 19(4):653-6. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1970.19.653. View