Karpiel I, Ziebinski A, Kluszczynski M, Feige D
Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(24).
PMID: 34960509
PMC: 8707023.
DOI: 10.3390/s21248410.
Oakley P, Betz J, Harrison D, Siskin L, Hirsh D
Dose Response. 2021; 19(3):15593258211033142.
PMID: 34421439
PMC: 8375354.
DOI: 10.1177/15593258211033142.
Kilicaslan O, Tokgoz M, Butun S, Nabi V, Akalin S
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021; 32(2):478-488.
PMID: 34145827
PMC: 8343868.
DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.49.
Liang J, Zhou X, Chen N, Li X, Yu H, Yang Y
Trials. 2018; 19(1):485.
PMID: 30201050
PMC: 6131734.
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2834-x.
Cracknell J, Lawson D, Taylor J
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2015; 59(3):261-8.
PMID: 26500360
PMC: 4593040.
Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Allam Y, El-Fiky T, Farghally M, Al-Sabagh S, Siam A
Eur Spine J. 2015; 25(2):444-9.
PMID: 26223745
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4162-0.
The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves.
Livanelioglu A, Kaya F, Nabiyev V, Demirkiran G, Firat T
Eur Spine J. 2015; 25(2):476-82.
PMID: 25900295
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3945-7.
Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis.
Shaw M, Adam C, Izatt M, Licina P, Askin G
Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(6):1062-8.
PMID: 22065167
PMC: 3366139.
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2059-0.
A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.
Vrtovec T, Pernus F, Likar B
Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(5):593-607.
PMID: 19247697
PMC: 3233998.
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0913-0.
Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach C
Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(10):1587-92.
PMID: 17549526
PMC: 2078306.
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0401-3.
Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Allen S, Parent E, Khorasani M, Hill D, Lou E, Raso J
J Digit Imaging. 2007; 21(2):208-18.
PMID: 17340228
PMC: 3043859.
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7.
Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study.
Ovadia D, Bar-On E, Fragniere B, Rigo M, Dickman D, Leitner J
Eur Spine J. 2006; 16(1):97-105.
PMID: 16705434
PMC: 2198878.
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0118-8.
Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb's method, by Ferguson's method and by a new method.
Diab K, Sevastik J, Hedlund R, Suliman I
Eur Spine J. 1995; 4(5):291-5.
PMID: 8581530
DOI: 10.1007/BF00301037.
Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.
Pruijs J, Hageman M, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen J
Skeletal Radiol. 1994; 23(7):517-20.
PMID: 7824978
DOI: 10.1007/BF00223081.
Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages.
Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, JEQUIER J
Eur Spine J. 1995; 4(2):88-94.
PMID: 7600156
DOI: 10.1007/BF00278918.
Parameter variation in stable scoliosis.
Pruijs J, Stengs C, Keessen W
Eur Spine J. 1995; 4(3):176-9.
PMID: 7552652
DOI: 10.1007/BF00298242.
A comparison of radiographic and computer-assisted measurements of thoracic and thoracolumbar sagittal curvature.
Singer K, Jones T, Breidahl P
Skeletal Radiol. 1990; 19(1):21-6.
PMID: 2326651
DOI: 10.1007/BF00197923.
