» Articles » PMID: 7552652

Parameter Variation in Stable Scoliosis

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1995 Jan 1
PMID 7552652
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The reliability of scoliosis parameters such as the Cobb angle, the angle of trunk rotation and moir e topography is known from several publications. These studies concern intra- and interobserver variations; they are in general of transversal nature, which means the measurements were performed on the same subject within a short time period. From clinical experience it appears that these variations may be greater when scoliosis patients are followed over several years. In order to determine the parameter variation in the follow-up of children with scoliosis, a retrospective study was undertaken. From among our outpatient population, 41 children with stable scoliosis over a period of at least 2 years were selected. Stable scoliosis was defined as a spinal deformity which, in retrospect, had not deteriorated during at least a 2-year period prior to the end of growth. Hence no indication for treatment was found for this group. The measurements of the angle of external trunk rotation, moiré topography and Cobb angle of these children during the follow-up period were submitted to statistical computations using one-way analysis of variance. Variations in the results of Cobb angle measurement and the measurement of the angle of trunk rotation were found to be no different to the variations in intra- and interobserver measurements as reported mainly from transversal studies. The variation found in moiré topography, in moiré contour lines and in angle moiré determination, was, however, considered too great for measurements to be reliable. In conclusion, only Cobb angle determination and external measurement of trunk rotation can be accepted as valid follow-up parameters from a methodological viewpoint.

Citing Articles

Psychometric measurement properties of patient-reported and observer-reported outcome measures for spinal mobilisations and manipulation on paediatric subjects with diverse medical conditions: A systematic review.

Hayton T, Gross A, Basson A, Olson K, Ang O, Milne N J Man Manip Ther. 2023; 32(3):234-254.

PMID: 38146749 PMC: 11216239. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2281650.


Psychometric properties of clinician-reported and performance-based outcomes cited in a scoping review on spinal manipulation and mobilization for pediatric populations with diverse medical conditions: a systematic review.

Hayton T, Gross A, Basson A, Olson K, Ang O, Milne N J Man Manip Ther. 2023; 32(3):255-283.

PMID: 38070150 PMC: 11216262. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2269038.


Body structures and physical complaints in upper limb reduction deficiency: a 24-year follow-up study.

Postema S, Van der Sluis C, Waldenlov K, Hermansson L PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49727.

PMID: 23226218 PMC: 3511484. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049727.


Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?.

de Carvalho A, Vialle R, Thomsen L, Amzallag J, Cluzel G, Ducou le Pointe H Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(10):1615-20.

PMID: 17619912 PMC: 2078320. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0437-4.

References
1.
Carr A, Jefferson R, Turner-Smith A, Weisz I, Thomas D, Stavrakis T . Surface stereophotogrammetry of thoracic kyphosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989; 60(2):177-80. DOI: 10.3109/17453678909149248. View

2.
Pruijs J, Hageman M, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen J . Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol. 1994; 23(7):517-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00223081. View

3.
Schumpe G, Hofmann P, Rossler H . [Follow-up problems in scoliosis patients]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1984; 122(3):243-54. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1044617. View

4.
Sahlstrand T . The clinical value of Moiré topography in the management of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986; 11(5):409-17. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198606000-00002. View

5.
Heise U, Behrend R, Hinzmann J . [Methods of surface measurements in idiopathic scoliosis]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1989; 127(1):51-5. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1040088. View