» Articles » PMID: 4248448

Response of Gnotobiotic Pigs to Escherichia Coli

Overview
Journal Can J Comp Med
Date 1970 Jul 1
PMID 4248448
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a study of the response of gnotobiotic pigs to coliform infections, 45 one-week-old germfree pigs were divided into five groups and each group was inoculated orally with a different strain of Escherichia coli. Three of these were enteropathogenic swine strains, P307[08:K87(B), K88 a,b (L):H19]; P570 [0138:K81]; P568[0141:K85a,b(B), K88a,b(L):H4], one was a virulent human strain, H224, [026:K60(B6)], and one was a non-enteropathogenic swine strain, P581[OX13:K68]. It was attempted to protect a portion of the pigs with orally administered specific antisera and sera from non-immunized specific pathogenfree (SPF) pigs. Observations were made on the clinical response, bacterial counts of feces and intestinal contents, gross pathological changes, distribution of the organisms in organs and serum hemagglutinin titers. Infection with E. coli P307 resulted in diarrhea, dehydration and death, unless the pig was protected with specific antiserum. The pigs infected with E. coli P570 had a transient diarrhea but retained their appetites and recovered. Those infected with the other three strains remained healthy throughout. No circulating hemagglutinating antibody against the test strains of E. coli could be detected in any of the pigs seven days or earlier post-inoculation. Relationship could not be established between the numbers of viable E. coli in the feces and the presence of clinical colibacillosis. Orally administered specific antiserum afforded protection against strain P307, but did not reduce the number of E. coli in the gut or alter their distribution in the internal organs. This suggested that the protective effect of specific antibody in the intestine was due to its action on a metabolite (enterotoxin) produced by E. coli P307 rather than the organism itself.

Citing Articles

Triple and quadruple cervical artery dissections: a systematic review of individual patient data.

Guglielmi V, Visser J, Arnold M, Sarikaya H, van den Berg R, Nederkoorn P J Neurol. 2019; 266(6):1383-1388.

PMID: 30904955 PMC: 6517349. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09269-1.


Deciphering interactions between the gut microbiota and the immune system via microbial cultivation and minimal microbiomes.

Clavel T, Gomes-Neto J, Lagkouvardos I, Ramer-Tait A Immunol Rev. 2017; 279(1):8-22.

PMID: 28856739 PMC: 5657458. DOI: 10.1111/imr.12578.


Pathogenicity of an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli hemolysin (hlyA) mutant in gnotobiotic piglets.

Moxley R, Berberov E, Francis D, Xing J, Moayeri M, Welch R Infect Immun. 1998; 66(10):5031-5.

PMID: 9746614 PMC: 108625. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.10.5031-5035.1998.


Intestinal antibody secretion in the young pig in response to oral immunization with Escherichia coli.

Porter P, KENWORTHY R, Noakes D, Allen W Immunology. 1974; 27(5):841-53.

PMID: 4611908 PMC: 1445675.


Susceptibility of gnotoibiotic swine to Escherichia coli isolated from nonenteric human infections.

Meyer R, RHOADES H, Simon J Appl Microbiol. 1972; 23(6):1167-9.

PMID: 4557565 PMC: 380527. DOI: 10.1128/am.23.6.1167-1169.1972.


References
1.
Sharpe H . A study of antibody levels in the young pig. Res Vet Sci. 1965; 6(4):490-7. View

2.
Kohler E, BOHL E . Studies of Escherichia coli in gnotobiotic pigs. I. Experimental reproduction of colibacillosis. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci. 1966; 30(7):199-203. PMC: 1494551. View

3.
Kohler E . Studies of escherichia coli in gnotobiotic pigs. V. Evaluation of the effects of oral and parenteral administration of immune serum. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci. 1967; 31(11):283-9. PMC: 1494746. View

4.
Kohler E, BOHL E . Studies of Escherichia coli in gnotobiotic pigs 3. Evaluation of orally administered specific antisera. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci. 1966; 30(8):233-7. PMC: 1494563. View

5.
Kohler E . Enterotoxic activity of filtrates of escherichia coli in young pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1968; 29(12):2263-74. View