Smeets J, Brenner E
Front Integr Neurosci. 2023; 17:1118240.
PMID: 37090903
PMC: 10114592.
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1118240.
Landwehr K
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021; 84(1):289-299.
PMID: 34341939
PMC: 8795064.
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02360-8.
Melmoth D, Grant S, Solomon J, Morgan M
Exp Brain Res. 2015; 233(7):1993-2000.
PMID: 25912606
PMC: 4464882.
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4263-3.
Matziridi M, Brenner E, Smeets J
PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e62436.
PMID: 23626819
PMC: 3633890.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062436.
Sedda A, Ferre E, Striemer C, Bottini G
Exp Brain Res. 2013; 227(4):487-96.
PMID: 23609832
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3525-1.
The Poggendorff illusion affects manual pointing as well as perceptual judgements.
Melmoth D, Tibber M, Grant S, Morgan M
Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47(14):3217-24.
PMID: 19665467
PMC: 2852533.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.024.
Why are saccades influenced by the Brentano illusion?.
de Grave D, Smeets J, Brenner E
Exp Brain Res. 2006; 175(1):177-82.
PMID: 16733700
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0536-1.
Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures.
Heath M, Rival C, Neely K
Exp Brain Res. 2005; 168(3):348-56.
PMID: 16175361
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0095-x.
How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.
Bernardis P, Knox P, Bruno N
Exp Brain Res. 2005; 162(2):133-44.
PMID: 15791463
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2121-9.
Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.
Predebon J
Exp Brain Res. 2005; 163(1):100-8.
PMID: 15654590
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2156-y.
Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?.
Glazebrook C, Dhillon V, Keetch K, Lyons J, Amazeen E, Weeks D
Exp Brain Res. 2004; 160(1):71-8.
PMID: 15300347
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1986-y.
Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements.
de Grave D, Brenner E, Smeets J
Exp Brain Res. 2004; 155(1):56-62.
PMID: 15064885
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1708-x.
Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.
Loomis J, Philbeck J, Zahorik P
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002; 28(5):1202-12.
PMID: 12421065
PMC: 4699171.
Vector coding in slow goal-directed arm movements.
De Graaf J, van der Gon J, Sittig A
Percept Psychophys. 1996; 58(4):587-601.
PMID: 8934689
DOI: 10.3758/bf03213092.
A quantitative analysis of illusion magnitude predicted by several averaging theories of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
DeLucia P
Percept Psychophys. 1993; 53(5):498-504.
PMID: 8332419
DOI: 10.3758/bf03205198.
A method to assess the relative contribution of lateral inhibition to the magnitude of visual-geometric illusions.
Coren S, Porac C, Aks D, Morikawa K
Percept Psychophys. 1988; 43(6):551-8.
PMID: 3399353
DOI: 10.3758/bf03207743.
Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization.
Abrams R, Landgraf J
Percept Psychophys. 1990; 47(4):349-59.
PMID: 2345688
DOI: 10.3758/bf03210875.
The extraretinal signal from the pursuit-eye-movement system: its role in the perceptual and the egocentric localization systems.
Honda H
Percept Psychophys. 1990; 48(5):509-15.
PMID: 2247334
DOI: 10.3758/bf03211595.
Framing effects and the reversed Müller-Lyer illusion.
Predebon J
Percept Psychophys. 1992; 52(3):307-14.
PMID: 1408641
DOI: 10.3758/bf03209147.