Neglect's Perspective on the Ponzo Illusion

Overview

Journal Exp Brain Res

Specialty Neurology

Date 2013 Apr 24

PMID 23609832

Citations 1

Authors

A Sedda

E R Ferre

C L Striemer

G Bottini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Visual illusions have been used to explore implicit perception in neglect. Previous studies have highlighted differences between length and surface illusion perception in neglect, but much less is known about depth illusion perception. In the Ponzo illusion (a classic depth illusion), two converging oblique lines modulate the perceived length of two horizontal lines. In the current study, we presented modified versions of the Ponzo illusion in which only one of the converging oblique lines was presented (alternatively the right or the left one). This manipulation allowed us to explore (1) how acute patients with neglect process depth illusions, and (2) whether awareness of both converging lines is necessary for the full effect of the illusion. To examine these questions, we had participants (i.e. healthy controls, patients with neglect and right brain-damaged patients) to make a perceptual judgment regarding the perceived length of the upper versus lower horizontal line within the Ponzo frame in four conditions: (1) the classic Ponzo illusion, (2) a "modified left" Ponzo illusion with a single oblique line on the left, (3) a "modified right" Ponzo illusion with a single oblique line on the right and (4) a control condition with parallel lines. The results indicated that all participants perceived the canonical Ponzo illusion and the modified right illusion. Critically, patients with neglect did not perceive the modified left illusion. In addition, for neglect patients, there was no difference in the strength of the perceived illusion when comparing the canonical illusion with the modified right illusion. Importantly, single case analysis revealed a high degree of variability in the neglect group that seemed to be linked with the amount of damage to occipital areas. Overall our results indicate that: (1) the classic Ponzo illusion might be perceived in neglect patients based solely on perception of the right side of the stimulus configuration, and (2) differences between types of illusions (i.e. depth vs. length), and variability between patients suggest that caution is needed when utilizing these kinds of illusions to assess implicit processing in neglect.

Citing Articles

When brain damage "improves" perception: neglect patients can localize motion-shifted probes better than controls.

de Vito S, Lunven M, Bourlon C, Duret C, Cavanagh P, Bartolomeo P J Neurophysiol. 2015; 114(6):3351-8.

PMID: 26510763 PMC: 6712582. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00757.2015.

References

Gregory R . DISTORTION OF VISUAL SPACE AS INAPPROPRIATE CONSTANCY SCALING. Nature. 1963; 199:678-80. DOI: 10.1038/199678a0. View

Fisher G . Gradients of distortion seen in the context of the Ponzo illusion and other contours. Q J Exp Psychol. 1968; 20(2):212-7. DOI: 10.1080/14640746808400153. View

Massironi M, Antonucci G, Pizzamiglio L, Vitale M, Zoccolotti P . The Wundt-Jastrow illusion in the study of spatial hemi-inattention. Neuropsychologia. 1988; 26(1):161-6. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90039-5. View

Post R, Welch R . Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions?. Perception. 1996; 25(5):569-81. DOI: 10.1068/p250569. View

Crawford J, Garthwaite P . Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia. 2002; 40(8):1196-208. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00224-x. View

Bisiach E, Vallar G, Perani D, Papagno C, Berti A . Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1986; 24(4):471-82. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90092-8. View

Grabowska A, Szymanska O, Nowicka A, Kwiecein M . The effect of unilateral brain lesions on perception of visual illusions. Behav Brain Res. 1992; 47(2):191-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80125-1. View

Olk B, Harvey M, Dow L, Murphy P . Illusion processing in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2001; 39(6):611-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00151-2. View

Prinzmetal W, Shimamura A, Mikolinski M . The Ponzo illusion and the perception of orientation. Percept Psychophys. 2001; 63(1):99-114. DOI: 10.3758/bf03200506. View

10.

Vuilleumier P, Valenza N, Landis T . Explicit and implicit perception of illusory contours in unilateral spatial neglect: behavioural and anatomical correlates of preattentive grouping mechanisms. Neuropsychologia. 2001; 39(6):597-610. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00148-2. View

11.

Diller L, Weinberg J . Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: the evolution of a rational remediation program. Adv Neurol. 1977; 18:63-82. View

12.

Welch R, Post R, Lum W, Prinzmetal W . The relationship between perceived length and egocentric location in Müller-Lyer figures with one versus two chevrons. Percept Psychophys. 2005; 66(7):1095-104. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196838. View

13.

Ro T, Rafal R . Perception of geometric illusions in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1996; 34(10):973-8. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00018-8. View

14.

Luo C, Wang S . Effects of figure context on the apparent length of a line. Percept Mot Skills. 1997; 85(2):551-8. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1997.85.2.551. View

15.

Milner A, Goodale M . Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 46(3):774-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005. View

16.

Fisher G . An experimental comparison of rectilinear and curvilinear illusions. Br J Psychol. 1968; 59(1):23-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1968.tb01112.x. View

17.

Blake R, Wilson H . Binocular vision. Vision Res. 2010; 51(7):754-70. PMC: 3050089. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.009. View

18.

Daini R, Angelelli P, Antonucci G, Cappa S, Vallar G . Illusions of length in spatial unilateral neglect. Cortex. 2002; 37(5):710-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70621-x. View

19.

Mattingley J, Bradshaw J, Bradshaw J . The effects of unilateral visuospatial neglect on perception of Müller-Lyer illusory figures. Perception. 1995; 24(4):415-33. DOI: 10.1068/p240415. View

20.

Gregory R . ILLUSORY PERCEPTION AS A CONSTANCY PHENOMENON. Nature. 1964; 204:302-3. DOI: 10.1038/204302b0. View