» Articles » PMID: 4029327

The Interaction of Conflicting Retinal Motion Stimuli in Oculomotor Control

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1985 Jan 1
PMID 4029327
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oculomotor response has been assessed in humans during the presentation of conflicting retinal motion stimuli. In the majority of experiments a background stimulus was made to move with a constant velocity ramp in one direction followed by rapid resets at regular intervals. In the absence of an adequate fixation target this ramp-reset stimulus induced a nystagmus with a slow-phase velocity and saccadic frequency which remained almost constant as reset frequency was increased from 2 to 5 Hz. Moreover, the induced eye velocity could be considerably increased if the subject attempted 'active' matching of display velocity. During both 'active' and 'passive' responses eye velocity gain reached a peak when display velocity was between 2 degrees/s and 5 degrees/s. The presence of small stationary targets induced a suppression of the passive ramp-reset response which was modified by target eccentricity and by tachistoscopic target illumination. When subjects pursued a sinusoidally oscillating target against a stationary structured background, eye velocity gain was significantly less than for pursuit against a blank background. The degree of interaction between conflicting stimuli was found to be dependent on their relative size, peripheral location and velocity. However, it appears that the human observer is able selectively to enhance feedback gain from one particular source in order to dominate stimuli from other unwanted sources.

Citing Articles

Neural mechanisms of background and velocity effects in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Schroder R, Keidel K, Trautner P, Radbruch A, Ettinger U Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 44(3):1002-1018.

PMID: 36331125 PMC: 9875926. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26127.


Pupil responses associated with the perception of gravitational vertical under directional optic flows.

Park J, Cho S, Choi J, Han J, Rah Y Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21303.

PMID: 34716355 PMC: 8556311. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00346-y.


Effect of visual attention and horizontal vergence in three-dimensional space on occurrence of optokinetic nystagmus.

Kanari K, Kaneko H J Eye Mov Res. 2021; 12(1).

PMID: 33828722 PMC: 7905322. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.12.1.2.


Effect of visual attention on the properties of optokinetic nystagmus.

Kanari K, Sakamoto K, Kaneko H PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0175453.

PMID: 28388668 PMC: 5384781. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175453.


Cognitive processes involved in smooth pursuit eye movements: behavioral evidence, neural substrate and clinical correlation.

Fukushima K, Fukushima J, Warabi T, Barnes G Front Syst Neurosci. 2013; 7:4.

PMID: 23515488 PMC: 3601599. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00004.


References
1.
Buttner U, Meienberg O, Schimmelpfennig B . The effect of central retinal lesions on optokinetic nystagmus in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1983; 52(2):248-56. DOI: 10.1007/BF00236633. View

2.
Waespe W, Buttner U, Henn V . Input-output activity of the primate flocculus during visual-vestibular interaction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1981; 374:491-503. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb30894.x. View

3.
Barnes G, Edge A . Non-linear effects in visual suppression of vestibular nystagmus. Exp Brain Res. 1983; 52(1):9-19. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237143. View

4.
Dubois M, COLLEWIJN H . Optokinetic reactions in man elicited by localized retinal motion stimuli. Vision Res. 1979; 19(10):1105-15. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90005-1. View

5.
Westheimer G . Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954; 52(6):932-41. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1954.00920050938013. View