» Articles » PMID: 2928075

Human Optokinetic Nystagmus: Competition Between Stationary and Moving Displays

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1989 Feb 1
PMID 2928075
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We reported earlier that occlusion of the central retina and stationary edges have highly interactive effects on the gain of optokinetic nystagmus (OKN; Murasugi, Howard, & Ohmi, 1986). In this study, we explored this effect in more detail. A central occluding band of variable height, flanked by vertical bars, was superimposed onto an array of dots moving at 30 degrees per second. The height of the occluding band required to abolish OKN increased with the separation of the vertical bars. For bars 3.5 degrees apart, OKN was abolished in most subjects when a band only 6' high ran between them. For bars 75 degrees apart, a band at least 20 degrees in height was required to abolish the response. The effects of the stationary figure depended to some extent on the subject's attention, but only at intermediate values of bar separation. Both low- and high-level mechanisms are proposed to account for the results.

Citing Articles

Neural mechanisms to incorporate visual counterevidence in self-movement estimation.

Tanaka R, Zhou B, Agrochao M, Badwan B, Au B, Matos N Curr Biol. 2023; 33(22):4960-4979.e7.

PMID: 37918398 PMC: 10848174. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.011.


Neural mechanisms to incorporate visual counterevidence in self motion estimation.

Tanaka R, Zhou B, Agrochao M, Badwan B, Au B, Matos N bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36711843 PMC: 9881891. DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.04.522814.


Does intermittence in induced rotary movement have any explanatory significance?.

Reinhardt-Rutland A Percept Psychophys. 1991; 49(6):579-82.

PMID: 1857633 DOI: 10.3758/bf03212196.


Suppression of optokinesis by a stabilized target: effects of instruction and stimulus frequency.

Pola J, Wyatt H, Lustgarten M Percept Psychophys. 1992; 52(2):186-200.

PMID: 1508626 DOI: 10.3758/bf03206772.

References
1.
Hoffmann K, Schoppmann A . A quantitative analysis of the direction-specific response of Neurons in the cat's nucleus of the optic tract. Exp Brain Res. 1981; 42(2):146-57. DOI: 10.1007/BF00236901. View

2.
Van Die G, COLLEWIJN H . Control of human optokinetic nystagmus by the central and peripheral retina: effects of partial visual field masking, scotopic vision and central retinal scotomata. Brain Res. 1986; 383(1-2):185-94. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90019-3. View

3.
Wyatt H, Pola J . A mechanism for suppression of optokinesis. Vision Res. 1984; 24(12):1931-45. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90027-0. View

4.
Yee R, Daniels S, Jones O, Baloh R, Honrubia V . Effects of an optokinetic background on pursuit eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983; 24(8):1115-22. View

5.
COLLEWIJN H, Tamminga E . Human fixation and pursuit in normal and open-loop conditions: effects of central and peripheral retinal targets. J Physiol. 1986; 379:109-29. PMC: 1182887. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016243. View