» Articles » PMID: 40068821

Landscape Heterogeneity and Novelty Drive Avian Oscillatory Flight Behaviour During Forebrain Wulst-dependent Visual Map Learning

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2025 Mar 11
PMID 40068821
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Homing pigeons rely on familiar landscape features in learning a visual map, which is orchestrated by the forebrain visual Wulst and hippocampus. Recent global positioning system tracking studies showed that pigeons with damage to the visual Wulst or hippocampus exhibited a still poorly understood, persistent oscillatory flight behaviour, unlike intact pigeons whose oscillations decrease with experience. To evaluate whether landscape heterogeneity influences the extent of these oscillations, we compared the flight behaviour of both intact and Wulst-lesioned pigeons when flying over the sea versus land. Regardless of treatment, pigeons exhibited less oscillatory flight behaviour over the homogeneous landscape of the sea. Further releases from familiar and unfamiliar sites tested whether oscillatory flight behaviour may be influenced by the level of familiarity with the landscape. Indeed, intact pigeons reduced their oscillatory behaviour as landscape familiarity increased. In contrast, Wulst-damaged pigeons persisted in displaying robust oscillatory flight behaviour regardless of the level of landscape familiarity, suggesting that previously experienced landscapes remained relatively unfamiliar to them. The data support the hypothesis that oscillatory flight behaviour reflects active visual scanning, most pronounced over novel, heterogeneous landscapes, contributing to visual map learning. Further, the data suggest a crucial role of the forebrain Wulst for such learning.

Citing Articles

Landscape heterogeneity and novelty drive avian oscillatory flight behaviour during forebrain Wulst-dependent visual map learning.

Cioccarelli S, Giunchi D, Casini G, Pollonara E, Bingman V, Gagliardo A Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2042):20243099.

PMID: 40068821 PMC: 11896696. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.3099.

References
1.
Cioccarelli S, Giunchi D, Pollonara E, Casini G, Bingman V, Gagliardo A . GPS tracking technology and re-visiting the relationship between the avian visual Wulst and homing pigeon navigation. Behav Brain Res. 2024; 465:114971. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114971. View

2.
Casini G, Bingman V, Bagnoli P . Connections of the pigeon dorsomedial forebrain studied with WGA-HRP and 3H-proline. J Comp Neurol. 1986; 245(4):454-70. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902450403. View

3.
Hahmann U, Gunturkun O . The visual acuity for the lateral visual field of the pigeon (Columba livia). Vision Res. 1993; 33(12):1659-64. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90031-q. View

4.
Hodos W, Macko K, Bessette B . Near-field acuity changes after visual system lesions in pigeons. II. Telencephalon. Behav Brain Res. 1984; 13(1):15-30. DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(84)90026-3. View

5.
Watanabe S . Effect of lesions in the ectostriatum and Wulst on species and individual discrimination in pigeons. Behav Brain Res. 1992; 49(2):197-203. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80165-2. View