Co-designed Neck Exercise (EPIC-Neck) Vs Usual Exercise Care for People with Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain: Protocol for a Randomised Feasibility Study with Process Evaluation

Overview

Journal Pilot Feasibility Stud

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2025 Mar 8

PMID 40057809

Authors

Jonathan Price

Alison Rushton

Natalie Ives

Kate Jolly

Priti Parmar

Colin Greaves

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend that people with chronic non-specific neck pain self-manage symptoms with physiotherapy-led exercise. However, current exercise strategies have modest short-term effects, engagement is poor, and 48% of people continue to experience long-term and recurrent pain. Updated exercise strategies co-produced using complex intervention development frameworks are required that consider the behavioural, psychological, environmental, and technical aspects of exercise prescription and patient adherence to optimise symptom outcomes, long-term engagement, and self-management. This study tests the feasibility and acceptability of the EPIC-Neck programme ("Exercise Prescription Improved through Co-design") which is grounded in evidence and theory and was co-produced using intervention mapping principles. The aim of the EPIC-Neck programme is to optimise the short-term outcomes of and long-term engagement with neck exercise.

Methods: This is a randomised feasibility study with process evaluation to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the EPIC-Neck programme and inform the design of a large-scale definitive trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the EPIC-Neck programme. A multicentre two-arm randomised controlled feasibility study aiming to recruit 45 adults with chronic non-specific neck pain will be conducted in UK NHS musculoskeletal physiotherapy departments. Recruitment will be from waiting lists and clinic advertisements. Participants will be individually randomised in 2:1 ratio to either the EPIC-Neck programme (n = 30) or usual exercise care (n = 15). The primary feasibility objective is to determine whether to continue to a large-scale definitive trial by evaluating delivery fidelity, acceptability, contamination, and rates of recruitment and retention (outcome completion at follow-up). Other feasibility objectives are to evaluate safety, define usual exercise care, refine the EPIC-Neck programme and training, and explore the demographics of people who do and do not enrol onto the study. Outcomes will be assessed by questionnaires at baseline and at 3- and 6-month post-randomisation, appointment audio-recordings, and one-to-one semi-structured interviews with participants receiving the EPIC-Neck programme (n = 12-15) and physiotherapists.

Discussion: This feasibility study will provide evidence of the feasibility and acceptability of the EPIC-Neck programme and guide the development of a definitive randomised controlled trial evaluating its clinical and cost-effectiveness within the NHS.

Trial Registrations: ISRCTN81746901.

References

Hawkes R, Cameron E, Miles L, French D . The Fidelity of Training in Behaviour Change Techniques to Intervention Design in a National Diabetes Prevention Programme. Int J Behav Med. 2021; 28(6):671-682. PMC: 8551141. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-021-09961-5. View

Wilhelm M, Donaldson M, Griswold D, Learman K, Garcia A, Learman S . The Effects of Exercise Dosage on Neck-Related Pain and Disability: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020; 50(11):607-621. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9155. View

Rookes T, Schrag A, Walters K, Armstrong M . Measures of fidelity of delivery and engagement in self-management interventions: A systematic review of measures. Clin Trials. 2022; 19(6):665-672. PMC: 9679554. DOI: 10.1177/17407745221118555. View

Thabane L, Lancaster G . A guide to the reporting of protocols of pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019; 5:37. PMC: 6393983. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0423-8. View

Modarresi S, Lukacs M, Ghodrati M, Salim S, MacDermid J, Walton D . A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Psychometric Properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for Use in People With Neck Pain. Clin J Pain. 2021; 38(2):132-148. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000999. View

Thompson T, Lambert J, Greaves C, Taylor A . Intervention delivery fidelity assessment of a counseling-based intervention for promoting smoking reduction and increasing physical activity. Health Psychol. 2018; 37(7):627-637. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000613. View

Chlan L, Ridgeway J, Tofthagen C, Hamann B, Mele K, Dozois D . Iterative development and pilot testing of an intervention fidelity monitoring plan for the enhanced, electronic health record-facilitated pragmatic clinical trial: Implications for training and protocol integrity. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021; 24:100868. PMC: 8617340. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100868. View

Mellor K, Albury C, Dutton S, Eldridge S, Hopewell S . Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023; 9(1):59. PMC: 10105402. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01291-5. View

Nolet P, Cote P, Kristman V, Rezai M, Carroll L, Cassidy J . Is neck pain associated with worse health-related quality of life 6 months later? A population-based cohort study. Spine J. 2014; 15(4):675-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.12.009. View

10.

Teare M, Dimairo M, Shephard N, Hayman A, Whitehead A, Walters S . Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study. Trials. 2014; 15:264. PMC: 4227298. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-264. View

11.

Beneciuk J, George S, Greco C, Schneider M, Wegener S, Saper R . Targeted interventions to prevent transitioning from acute to chronic low back pain in high-risk patients: development and delivery of a pragmatic training course of psychologically informed physical therapy for the TARGET trial. Trials. 2019; 20(1):256. PMC: 6501335. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3350-3. View

12.

Craven K, Holmes J, Powers K, Clarke S, Cripps R, Lindley R . Embedding mentoring to support trial processes and implementation fidelity in a randomised controlled trial of vocational rehabilitation for stroke survivors. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021; 21(1):203. PMC: 8487447. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01382-y. View

13.

Andersen N, Kent P, Hjort J, Christiansen D . Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):130. PMC: 5371202. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1487-3. View

14.

Yang H, Haldeman S . Chronic Spinal Pain and Financial Worries in the US Adult Population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 45(8):528-533. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003319. View

15.

Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios L . A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:1. PMC: 2824145. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. View

16.

Robinson K, Allen F, Darby J, Fox C, Gordon A, Horne J . Contamination in complex healthcare trials: the falls in care homes (FinCH) study experience. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):46. PMC: 7047395. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-00925-z. View

17.

Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S . GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2017; 3:13. PMC: 5611595. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. View

18.

Eldridge S, Chan C, Campbell M, Bond C, Hopewell S, Thabane L . CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016; 355:i5239. PMC: 5076380. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5239. View

19.

To D, De Carvalho D, Pike A, Lawrence R, Etchegary H, Patey A . A qualitative study exploring perceived barriers and enablers to fidelity of training and delivery for an intervention to reduce non-indicated imaging for low back pain. Chiropr Man Therap. 2023; 31(1):6. PMC: 9890790. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00480-6. View

20.

Bennell K, Nelligan R, Rini C, Keefe F, Kasza J, French S . Effects of internet-based pain coping skills training before home exercise for individuals with hip osteoarthritis (HOPE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2018; 159(9):1833-1842. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001281. View