» Articles » PMID: 37061720

Recommendations for Progression Criteria During External Randomised Pilot Trial Design, Conduct, Analysis and Reporting

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Apr 15
PMID 37061720
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: External randomised pilot trials aim to assess whether a future definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is feasible. Prespecified progression criteria help guide the interpretation of pilot trial findings to decide whether, and how, a definitive RCT should be conducted. This commentary presents a set of proposed recommendations for progression criteria to guide researchers when (i) designing, (ii) conducting, (iii) analysing and (iv) reporting external randomised pilot trials.

Methods: Recommendations were developed following a mixed methods approach. This involved (i) a methodological review of pilot trial publications, (ii) a cross-sectional study of pilot trial research funding applications, (iii) qualitative interviews with pilot trial researchers and (iv) a survey of corresponding authors of identified pilot trial publications. Initial recommendations were refined following two consultation stakeholder workshops held in July 2022. Recommendations for progression criteria for external randomised pilot trials: i.

Design: consider progression criteria from the earliest opportunity; map progression criteria to feasibility objectives; consider quantitative and qualitative interpretations of feasibility; provide justification; develop guidelines rather than rules; seek input from relevant stakeholders. ii. Conduct: regularly monitor pilot trial data against progression criteria. iii.

Analysis: avoid considering each progression criterion in isolation; engage in discussion with relevant stakeholders; consider context and other factors external to the pilot trial; consider feasibility (can we?) and progression (will we?). iv. Reporting: we propose a reporting checklist in relation to progression criteria and recommend reporting in a table format for clarity.

Conclusion: These recommendations provide a helpful resource for researchers to consider progression criteria at different stages of external randomised pilot trials. We have produced a simple infographic tool to summarise these recommendations for researchers to refer to. Further research is needed to evaluate whether these proposed recommendations should inform future development, or update, of established guidelines for the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of external randomised pilot trials.

Citing Articles

The feasibility and acceptability of an online mindfulness-based stress reduction program for chronic musculoskeletal pain: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Amorim A, Rebbeck T, Van Dam N, Johnstone C, Ashton-James C, Costa N Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025; 11(1):30.

PMID: 40089768 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-025-01612-w.


Co-designed neck exercise (EPIC-Neck) vs usual exercise care for people with chronic non-specific neck pain: protocol for a randomised feasibility study with process evaluation.

Price J, Rushton A, Ives N, Jolly K, Parmar P, Greaves C Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025; 11(1):26.

PMID: 40057809 PMC: 11889939. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-025-01608-6.


A school-based intervention to improve mental health outcomes for children with cerebral visual impairment (CVI): feasibility cluster randomised trial.

Williams C, Pease A, Goodenough T, Breheny K, Shirkey B, Watanabe R Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025; 11(1):24.

PMID: 40033436 PMC: 11874832. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-025-01603-x.


A feasibility study of the internet-based intervention "Strategies for Empowering activities in Everyday life" (SEE 1.0) applied for people with stroke.

Larsson-Lund M, Barcheus I, Ranner M, Vikman I, Jacobsson L, Lexell E BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):330.

PMID: 40033363 PMC: 11877923. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12456-8.


Sessions of acupuncture and nutritional therapy evaluation for atrial fibrillation (Santé-AF): a randomised feasibility study.

Charlesworth K, Torgerson D, Watson J Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025; 11(1):21.

PMID: 40001242 PMC: 11854018. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-025-01604-w.


References
1.
Purcell A, Buckley T, King J, Moyle W, Marshall A . Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018; 4:123. PMC: 6035424. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0312-6. View

2.
Manzoli L, Flacco M, DAddario M, Capasso L, De Vito C, Marzuillo C . Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey. BMJ. 2014; 348:g3058. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g3058. View

3.
Chapman S, Shelton B, Mahmood H, Fitzgerald J, Harrison E, Bhangu A . Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study. BMJ. 2014; 349:g6870. PMC: 4260649. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g6870. View

4.
Eldridge S, Chan C, Campbell M, Bond C, Hopewell S, Thabane L . CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016; 355:i5239. PMC: 5076380. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5239. View

5.
Young H, Goodliffe S, Madhani M, Phelps K, Regen E, Locke A . Co-producing Progression Criteria for Feasibility Studies: A Partnership between Patient Contributors, Clinicians and Researchers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(19). PMC: 6801439. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193756. View