Financial Rewards for Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy and Birth Weight: A Meta-Analysis

Overview

Journal JAMA Netw Open

Publisher American Medical Association

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2025 Mar 6

PMID 40048164

Authors

David Tappin

Jiyoung Lee

Alex McConnachie

Loren Kock

Stephen T Higgins

Sarah H Heil

Ivan Berlin

Steven J Ondersma

Frank Kee

Ira Bernstein

Linda Bauld

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Importance: Offering pregnant women financial rewards to stop smoking is associated with a more than 2-fold increase in smoking cessation and is cost-effective; however, it is possible that the association is the result of gaming of the outcome measure (eg, not smoking for 24 hours before outcome measurement using a carbon monoxide breath test). Birth weight is an outcome measure that is independent of the rewards process.

Objective: To examine birth weight change associated with offering financial rewards for smoking cessation to pregnant women, and to estimate the average expected birth weight change for neonates born to those who quit smoking because of the rewards.

Data Sources: Medline, American Psychological Association PsycInfo, Embase, Cochrane (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialized Register, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), and PubMed were searched from their inception until December 5, 2023, for published reports of trials of incentives for abstinence from substance use among pregnant women.

Study Selection: Only trials using an experimental design allowing treatment effects to be attributed to the reward intervention were included. For this review update, potentially relevant studies retrieved were screened by a reviewer.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Data were pooled using both fixed-effects and random-effects models. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcomes were mean (SD) birth weight, birth weight for gestational age z score, and numbers of newborns with low birth weight (<2.5 kg) and who were small for gestational age (<10th percentile).

Results: Fixed-effects intention-to-treat analysis including 8 trials (2351 participants)-2 trials from the UK (1475 participants), 1 trial from France (407 participants), and 5 trials from the US (469 participants)-estimated a statistically significant mean 46.30 g (95% CI, 0.05 to 92.60 g) birth weight increase associated with adding financial rewards for smoking cessation. Complier average causal effects analysis (2239 participants) estimated a mean 206.00 g (95% CI, -69.12 to 481.14 g) increase for neonates born to smokers who quit because of rewards, but the increase was not statistically significant. There was no association with low birth weight or birth weight adjusted for gestational age, although fewer neonates were born small for gestational age, particularly if cessation was associated with rewards (complier average causal effects risk difference -17.70%; 95% CI, -34.90% to -0.42%).

Conclusions And Relevance: In this meta-analysis, neonates were significantly heavier when pregnant women were offered the addition of financial rewards contingent on smoking cessation, supporting the effectiveness and, therefore, cost-effectiveness of financial rewards in this health care setting.

References

McKell J, Harris F, Sinclair L, Bauld L, Tappin D, Hoddinott P . Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation. BMJ Open. 2023; 12(12):e066494. PMC: 9730354. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066494. View

Gotz F, Gosling S, Rentfrow P . Effect sizes and what to make of them. Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(5):798-800. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01858-z. View

Ondersma S, Svikis D, Lam P, Connors-Burge V, Ledgerwood D, Hopper J . A randomized trial of computer-delivered brief intervention and low-intensity contingency management for smoking during pregnancy. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011; 14(3):351-60. PMC: 3281243. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr221. View

McConnachie A, Haig C, Sinclair L, Bauld L, Tappin D . Birth weight differences between those offered financial voucher incentives for verified smoking cessation and control participants enrolled in the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), employing an intuitive approach and a Complier.... Trials. 2017; 18(1):337. PMC: 5520300. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2053-x. View

Selvaratnam R, Sovio U, Cook E, Gaccioli F, Charnock-Jones D, Smith G . Objective measures of smoking and caffeine intake and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Int J Epidemiol. 2023; 52(6):1756-1765. PMC: 10749751. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad123. View

Tappin D, Bauld L, Purves D, Boyd K, Sinclair L, MacAskill S . Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015; 350:h134. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h134. View

Higgins S, Nighbor T, Kurti A, Heil S, Slade E, Shepard D . Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Efficacy of Adding Financial Incentives to Best practices for Smoking Cessation Among pregnant and Newly postpartum Women. Prev Med. 2022; 165(Pt B):107012. PMC: 9440164. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107012. View

Hamilton B . Estimating treatment effects in randomized clinical trials with non-compliance: the impact of maternal smoking on birthweight. Health Econ. 2001; 10(5):399-410. DOI: 10.1002/hec.629. View

Jones M, Smith M, Lewis S, Parrott S, Coleman T . Investigating the cost-effectiveness of three cessation interventions on a national scale using the Economics of Smoking in Pregnancy (ESIP) decision analytical model. Addiction. 2022; 117(11):2907-2917. PMC: 9796630. DOI: 10.1111/add.15968. View

10.

Villar J, Ismail L, Victora C, Ohuma E, Bertino E, Altman D . International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014; 384(9946):857-68. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60932-6. View

11.

Lawder R, Whyte B, Wood R, Fischbacher C, Tappin D . Impact of maternal smoking on early childhood health: a retrospective cohort linked dataset analysis of 697 003 children born in Scotland 1997-2009. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(3):e023213. PMC: 6475204. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023213. View

12.

Vaz L, Jones M, Szatkowski L, Tata L, Petrou S, Coleman T . Estimating the health-care costs of children born to pregnant smokers in England: cohort study using primary and secondary health-care data. Addiction. 2018; 113(7):1305-1316. PMC: 6033143. DOI: 10.1111/add.14183. View

13.

Higgins S, Washio Y, Lopez A, Heil S, Solomon L, Lynch M . Examining two different schedules of financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant women. Prev Med. 2014; 68:51-7. PMC: 4183736. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.024. View

14.

Notley C, Gentry S, Livingstone-Banks J, Bauld L, Perera R, Hartmann-Boyce J . Incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 7():CD004307. PMC: 6635501. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub6. View

15.

Tappin D, Sinclair L, Kee F, McFadden M, Robinson-Smith L, Mitchell A . Effect of financial voucher incentives provided with UK stop smoking services on the cessation of smoking in pregnant women (CPIT III): pragmatic, multicentre, single blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2022; 379:e071522. PMC: 9580214. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071522. View

16.

Goldstein A, Gans S, Ripley-Moffitt C, Kotsen C, Bars M . Use of Expired Air Carbon Monoxide Testing in Clinical Tobacco Treatment Settings. Chest. 2017; 153(2):554-562. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.002. View

17.

Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650):924-6. PMC: 2335261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. View

18.

Kock L, Erath T, Coleman S, Higgins S, Heil S . Contingency management interventions for abstinence from cigarette smoking in pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2023; 176:107654. PMC: 10828115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107654. View

19.

West S, Duan N, Pequegnat W, Gaist P, Des Jarlais D, Holtgrave D . Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(8):1359-66. PMC: 2446460. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.124446. View

20.

Heil S, Higgins S, Bernstein I, Solomon L, Rogers R, Thomas C . Effects of voucher-based incentives on abstinence from cigarette smoking and fetal growth among pregnant women. Addiction. 2008; 103(6):1009-18. PMC: 2731575. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02237.x. View