» Articles » PMID: 37532032

Contingency Management Interventions for Abstinence from Cigarette Smoking in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Aug 2
PMID 37532032
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contingency management is one of the most effective treatments for substance use disorders in not-pregnant people. The most recent quantitative review of its efficacy among pregnant and postpartum women who smoke cigarettes concluded with moderate certainty that those receiving contingent financial incentives were twice as likely to be abstinent compared with controls. We aimed to update and extend previous reviews. Five databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before December 2022 that assessed the effectiveness of incentives for abstinence from substance use. Data from trials of smoking abstinence were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model (restricted maximum likelihood). Results are reported as risk-ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022372291. Twelve RCTs (3136) pregnant women) were included. There was high certainty evidence that women receiving incentives were more likely to be abstinent than controls at the last antepartum assessment (12 RCTs; RR = 2.43, 95% CI 2.04-2.91, n = 2941, I = 0.0%) and moderate certainty evidence at the longest postpartum assessment while incentives were still available (five RCTs; RR = 2.72, 1.47-5.02, n = 659, I = 44.5%), and at the longest postpartum follow-up after incentives were discontinued (six RCTs; RR = 1.93, 1.08-3.46, n = 1753, I = 51.8%). Pregnant women receiving incentives are twice as likely to achieve smoking abstinence during pregnancy suggesting this intervention should be standard care for pregnant women who smoke. The results also demonstrate that abstinence continues into the postpartum period, including after incentives are discontinued, but more trials measuring outcomes in the postpartum period are needed to strengthen this conclusion.

Citing Articles

Financial Rewards for Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy and Birth Weight: A Meta-Analysis.

Tappin D, Lee J, McConnachie A, Kock L, Higgins S, Heil S JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(3):e250214.

PMID: 40048164 PMC: 11886724. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0214.


Incentives for smoking cessation.

Notley C, Gentry S, Livingstone-Banks J, Bauld L, Perera R, Conde M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 1:CD004307.

PMID: 39799985 PMC: 11725379. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub7.

References
1.
Baker T, Fraser D, Kobinsky K, Adsit R, Smith S, Khalil L . A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives to low income pregnant women to engage in smoking cessation treatment: Effects on post-birth abstinence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018; 86(5):464-473. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000278. View

2.
Donatelle R, Prows S, CHAMPEAU D, Hudson D . Randomised controlled trial using social support and financial incentives for high risk pregnant smokers: significant other supporter (SOS) program. Tob Control. 2000; 9 Suppl 3:III67-9. PMC: 1766304. DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_3.iii67. View

3.
Lopez A, Skelly J, White T, Higgins S . Does impulsiveness moderate response to financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant and newly postpartum women?. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015; 23(2):97-108. PMC: 4388785. DOI: 10.1037/a0038810. View

4.
Heil S, Higgins S, Bernstein I, Solomon L, Rogers R, Thomas C . Effects of voucher-based incentives on abstinence from cigarette smoking and fetal growth among pregnant women. Addiction. 2008; 103(6):1009-18. PMC: 2731575. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02237.x. View

5.
Cnattingius S . The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6 Suppl 2:S125-40. DOI: 10.1080/14622200410001669187. View