» Articles » PMID: 40042447

Polygenic Score Integrating Neurodegenerative and Vascular Risk Informs Dementia Risk Stratification

Abstract

Introduction: An integrative polygenic risk score (iPRS) capturing the neurodegenerative and vascular contribution to dementia could identify high-risk individuals and improve risk prediction.

Methods: We developed an iPRS for dementia (iPRS-DEM) in Europeans (aged 65+), comprising genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 23 vascular or neurodegenerative traits (excluding apolipoprotein E [APOE]). iPRS-DEM was evaluated across cohorts comprising older community-dwelling people (N = 3702), a multi-ancestry biobank (N = 130,797 Europeans; 105,404 non-Europeans), and dementia-free memory clinic participants (N = 2032).

Results: iPRS-DEM was associated with dementia risk independently of APOE in the elderly (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]= 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.28), which generalized to Europeans (EUR-sHR= 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.51]), East-Asians (EAS-sHR= 5.29, 95% CI: 1.43 to 34.36), and memory-clinic participants (sHR= 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.42). Prediction was comparable to clinical risk factors in older community-dwelling people, with improved performance among memory-clinic patients. Risk stratification was enhanced by defining four genetic risk groups with iPRS-DEM and APOE ε4, reaching five-fold increased risk in APOE ε4+/iPRS-DEM+ memory-clinic participants.

Discussion: Alongside APOE ε4, iPRS-DEM may refine risk stratification for the enrichment of dementia clinical trials and prevention programs.

Highlights: iPRS-DEM reflects neurodegenerative and vascular contribution to dementia. We show iPRS-DEM captures additional dementia genetic risk beyond APOE and AD-PRS. iPRS-DEM, in combination with APOE ε4, shows promise for dementia risk stratification. Our results generalize across both population-based and memory-clinic settings. We show transportability of iPRS-DEM to East Asian ancestry.

References
1.
Solomon A, Turunen H, Ngandu T, Peltonen M, Levalahti E, Helisalmi S . Effect of the Apolipoprotein E Genotype on Cognitive Change During a Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018; 75(4):462-470. PMC: 5885273. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4365. View

2.
van der Lee S, Wolters F, Ikram M, Hofman A, Ikram M, Amin N . The effect of APOE and other common genetic variants on the onset of Alzheimer's disease and dementia: a community-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17(5):434-444. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30053-X. View

3.
Weuve J, Proust-Lima C, Power M, Gross A, Hofer S, Thiebaut R . Guidelines for reporting methodological challenges and evaluating potential bias in dementia research. Alzheimers Dement. 2015; 11(9):1098-109. PMC: 4655106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.06.1885. View

4.
Prive F, Arbel J, Vilhjalmsson B . LDpred2: better, faster, stronger. Bioinformatics. 2020; 36(22-23):5424-5431. PMC: 8016455. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1029. View

5.
Kattan M, Gerds T . The index of prediction accuracy: an intuitive measure useful for evaluating risk prediction models. Diagn Progn Res. 2019; 2:7. PMC: 6460739. DOI: 10.1186/s41512-018-0029-2. View