» Articles » PMID: 40035283

A Mini-Fluid Challenge to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Swine

Overview
Date 2025 Mar 4
PMID 40035283
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unnecessary and excessive fluid therapy increases the risk of adverse effects such as pulmonary edema. To prevent this, a mini-fluid challenge (MFC) has been utilized to predict whether fluid therapy will improve circulatory dynamics in human intensive care medicine. The study described here investigated whether MFC is also efficacious in pigs. Thirty-two domestic pigs anesthetized and maintained under mechanical ventilation were treated with successive IV fluid administrations of 2, 1, 1, and 2 mL/kg over a 10-min period for a total dose of 6 mL/kg of Ringer lactate. The percentage increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 2, 3, and 4 mL/kg of cumulative fluid administration was examined to determine whether responders could be identified that would benefit hemodynamically from higher doses of fluids. For the purposes of this study, a 10% increase or more in MAP after 6 mL/kg of fluid administration defined responders, and an increase of less than 10% in MAP was used to define nonresponders. The percentage increase in MAP at 2, 3, and 4 mL/kg fluid administration was evaluated to determine whether this could predict responder status. Eleven of the 32 animals were determined to be responders. Responder status was predicted with high accuracy by the administration of 3 mL/kg (AUC = 0.98) and was moderately predicted with administration of 2 mL/kg (AUC = 0.80), as well as pulse pressure variation (AUC = 0.75). Thus, MFC may be helpful to maintain tissue perfusion in pigs through the use of managed fluid therapy.

References
1.
Kubitz J, Forkl S, Annecke T, Kronas N, Goetz A, Reuter D . Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34(8):1520-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1114-8. View

2.
Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V, Vivier E, Metton O, Branche P . Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 33(1):163-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0412-2. View

3.
Marik P, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A . Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(9):2642-7. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da. View

4.
Cherpanath T, Geerts B, Lagrand W, Schultz M, Groeneveld A . Basic concepts of fluid responsiveness. Neth Heart J. 2013; 21(12):530-6. PMC: 3833913. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-013-0487-7. View

5.
Vincent J, Cecconi M, De Backer D . The fluid challenge. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):703. PMC: 7771055. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03443-y. View