Advanced QT Interval Analysis in Long-term Electrocardiography Using Shape-based Clustering and Template Matching: A Novel Approach for Holter Monitoring

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2025 Mar 3

PMID 40028568

Authors

Kaoru Hatano

Tomohiro Takata

Mineki Takechi

Akane Wada

Hirohisa Taniguchi

Yuichi Tamura

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The QT interval, a critical parameter in electrocardiography (ECG), is challenging to analyze accurately because of variations in T-wave morphology, especially in long-term ECG recordings, such as Holter monitoring. Current methods, which are often manual or semi-automated, lack consistency and efficiency, underscoring the need for a more reliable and automated approach.

Methods: We developed a novel QT interval analysis algorithm that integrates K-shape clustering with Dynamic Time Warping under Limited Warping Path Length for template matching. This method automatically categorizes ECG waveforms into clusters based on shape similarity, and then selects representative template waveforms for each cluster. This approach aimed to standardize and automate the process of identifying and analyzing QT intervals across varying waveform patterns.

Results: Validation of the algorithm using the QT Database, which encompasses a broad spectrum of ECG waveform patterns, confirmed its ability to accurately identify and analyze the QT interval across diverse T-wave morphologies, in close agreement with expert human analysis. The reliability of the algorithm was quantified using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. For the QT interval, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (2,1) was 0.9 [95 % CI: 0.89, 0.91], and for the QTcB interval, it was 0.82 [95 % CI: 0.80, 0.84], both reflecting high reliability. The reliability of the algorithm was also evaluated by comparing it with DSC5500 from Nihon Kohden analysis program for long-time ECGs, a commercial software program that uses the tangential method. For the QT interval calculated by the developed algorithm, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (2,1) was 0.95 [95 % CI: 0.92, 0.97], and for the QT interval calculated by the DSC 5500, it was 0.70 [95 % CI: 0.54, 0.81]. For all waves, the mean and standard deviation of the difference between the algorithm and the expert analysis was 0.5 (±16), and that of the difference between the DSC5500 and the expert analysis was -16.4 (±42.8). For biphasic T-wave, the mean and standard deviation of the difference between the algorithm and the expert analysis was -0.3 (±15.9), and that of the difference between the DSC5500 and the expert analysis was -79.3 (±60.6). The results showed that the developed algorithm performed better than the DSC5500 for all shapes, especially for biphasic T-wave. The algorithm also demonstrated enhanced time efficiency and streamlined QT interval analysis in clinical settings.

Discussion: The new algorithm enhanced automated QT interval analysis, especially for long-term ECG recordings. Its effectiveness in processing different T-wave morphologies with accuracy and efficiency makes it a promising tool for clinical use and improving QT interval analysis in patient care and diagnostics.

References

Meyer O, Ferber G, Greig G, Holzgrefe H . Pattern recognition analysis of digital ECGs: decreased QT measurement error and improved precision compared to semi-automated methods. J Electrocardiol. 2012; 46(2):118-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.11.012. View

Tisdale J, Chung M, Campbell K, Hammadah M, Joglar J, Leclerc J . Drug-Induced Arrhythmias: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020; 142(15):e214-e233. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000905. View

McLaughlin N, CAMPBELL R, Murray A . Comparison of automatic QT measurement techniques in the normal 12 lead electrocardiogram. Br Heart J. 1995; 74(1):84-9. PMC: 483954. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.74.1.84. View

Goldberger A, Amaral L, Glass L, Hausdorff J, Ivanov P, Mark R . PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation. 2000; 101(23):E215-20. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215. View

Martinez J, Almeida R, Olmos S, Rocha A, Laguna P . A wavelet-based ECG delineator: evaluation on standard databases. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004; 51(4):570-81. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2003.821031. View

Vila J, Gang Y, Rodriguez Presedo J, Fernandez-Delgado M, Barro S, Malik M . A new approach for TU complex characterization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000; 47(6):764-72. DOI: 10.1109/10.844227. View

Grenier J, Paglialunga S, Morimoto B, Lester R . Evaluating cardiac risk: exposure response analysis in early clinical drug development. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2018; 10:27-36. PMC: 5912368. DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S133286. View

Laguna P, Jane R, Caminal P . Automatic detection of wave boundaries in multilead ECG signals: validation with the CSE database. Comput Biomed Res. 1994; 27(1):45-60. DOI: 10.1006/cbmr.1994.1006. View

Drew B, Califf R, Funk M, Kaufman E, Krucoff M, Laks M . Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by.... Circulation. 2004; 110(17):2721-46. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145144.56673.59. View

10.

Drew B, Ackerman M, Funk M, Gibler W, Kligfield P, Menon V . Prevention of torsade de pointes in hospital settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(9):934-47. PMC: 3057430. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.001. View

11.

Mason J, Moon T . Automated measurements for individualized heart rate correction of the QT interval. Clin Trials. 2015; 12(2):149-55. DOI: 10.1177/1740774514566332. View

12.

Hughes N, Roberts S, Tarassenko L . Semi-supervised learning of probabilistic models for ECG segmentation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2006:434-7. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1403187. View

13.

Daskalov I, Christov I . Automatic detection of the electrocardiogram T-wave end. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999; 37(3):348-53. DOI: 10.1007/BF02513311. View

14.

Alam R, Aguirre A, Stultz C . QTNet: Deep Learning for Estimating QT Intervals Using a Single Lead ECG. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2024; 2023:1-4. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10341204. View

15.

Khawaja A, Petrovic R, Safer A, Baas T, Dossel O, Fischer R . Analyzing Thorough QT Study 1 & 2 in the Telemetric and Holter ECG Warehouse (THEW) using Hannover ECG System HES : A validation study. Comput Cardiol (2010). 2011; 37:349-352. PMC: 3138519. View

16.

Wu Z, Zhou P, He N, Zhai S . Drug-induced torsades de pointes: Disproportionality analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:966331. PMC: 9639787. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.966331. View

17.

Alahmadi A, Davies A, Vigo M, Jay C . Pseudo-colouring an ECG enables lay people to detect QT-interval prolongation regardless of heart rate. PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0237854. PMC: 7451551. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237854. View

18.

Chui R, Vargas H . A comparison of three software platforms for automated ECG analysis. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2009; 60(1):28-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2009.05.004. View

19.

Uchikawa M, Hashiguchi M, Shiga T . Drug-Induced QT Prolongation and Torsade de Pointes in Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting: A Retrospective Analysis Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database (2004-2021). Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022; 9(4):551-559. PMC: 9712895. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-022-00328-0. View

20.

Koeleman A, Ros H, van den Akker T . Beat-to-beat interval measurement in the electrocardiogram. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1985; 23(3):213-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02446860. View