» Articles » PMID: 40022209

Application of Nordic Keyhole and Nutri-Score for Assessment of Nutritional Quality of Plant-based Dairy Analogues

Overview
Journal BMC Nutr
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2025 Feb 28
PMID 40022209
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Public interest in plant-based dairy analogues is increasing; thus, their assessment by front-of-pack nutrition labelling schemes such as Keyhole and Nutri-Score can facilitate the identification of products with optimal nutritional quality. In this study, Keyhole and the latest version of Nutri-Score criteria were applied to plant-based dairy analogues (i.e., milk, yoghurt, cheese, cream, fat spread, and ice cream analogues) in the Swedish market to evaluate their nutritional quality.

Methods: Nutritional data for 222 plant-based dairy analogues were collected from food manufacturers' websites, and the eligibility of these analogues for Keyhole and Nutri-Score (A to E) were assessed. Products eligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B were deemed to have optimal nutritional quality.

Results: 16% of plant-based milk analogues (from oat-, almond-, rice-, and potato-based products), 2% of plant-based yoghurt analogues and 37% of plant-based fat spread analogues were eligible for Keyhole. The plant-based cheese, cream and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Keyhole. None of the plant-based milk analogues qualified for Nutri-Score A, and 45% (mainly soy-, almond-, coconut-, pea- and mixed-based products) qualified for Nutri-Score B. 68% of plant-based yoghurt analogues (from oat-, soy-, almond- and mixed-based products) qualified for Nutri-Score A or B. The plant-based cheese, fat spread and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Nutri-Score A or B and 32% of plant-based cream analogues qualified for Nutri-Score B. A higher percentage of organic milk analogues and a lower percentage of organic yoghurt analogues were eligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B compared to their non-organic varieties. Keyhole and Nutri-Score had an agreement on classifying two plant-based dairy analogues as optimal nutritional quality products and 133 plant-based dairy analogues as suboptimal.

Conclusions: There is variability in the eligibility of plant-based dairy analogues for Keyhole and Nutri-Score labelling. Eligibility for Keyhole was highest among plant-based fat spread analogues, while Nutri-Score A and B ratings were more common for plant-based yoghurt analogues. Plant-based cheese and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B. Since the micronutrient content of organic and non-organic plant-based dairy analogues did not affect their evaluation by Keyhole and Nutri-Score, this limitation warrants further consideration.

References
1.
Craig W, Mangels A, Brothers C . Nutritional Profiles of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Cheese Alternatives. Nutrients. 2022; 14(6). PMC: 8952881. DOI: 10.3390/nu14061247. View

2.
Craig W, Fresan U . International Analysis of the Nutritional Content and a Review of Health Benefits of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Beverages. Nutrients. 2021; 13(3). PMC: 7999853. DOI: 10.3390/nu13030842. View

3.
Pitt S, Julin B, Ovrebo B, Wolk A . Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels: Comparing the Nordic Keyhole and Nutri-Score in a Swedish Context. Nutrients. 2023; 15(4). PMC: 9967491. DOI: 10.3390/nu15040873. View

4.
de Las Heras-Delgado S, Shyam S, Cunillera E, Dragusan N, Salas-Salvado J, Babio N . Are plant-based alternatives healthier? A two-dimensional evaluation from nutritional and processing standpoints. Food Res Int. 2023; 169:112857. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112857. View

5.
Drewnowski A . The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91(4):1095S-1101S. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D. View