Echocardiographic Evaluation of Indices of Severity Of Pulmonary Stenosis in Dogs: Reproducibility and Effects of General Anesthesia

Overview

Journal J Vet Intern Med

Specialties General Medicine
Veterinary Medicine

Date 2025 Feb 26

PMID 40008828

Authors

Evan S Ross

Lance C Visser

Lalida Tantisuwat

Khursheed Mama

Brianna M Potter

Brian A Scansen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The effects of general anesthesia (GA) on less flow-dependent (velocity ratio, velocity time integral [VTI] ratio and indexed pulmonary valve area [iPVA]) and flow-dependent (mean [PVmeanPG] and maximum pressure gradient [PVmaxPG]) indices of severity of pulmonary stenosis (PS) are unclear.

Objectives: Determine the effects of GA on indices of severity of PS in dogs undergoing an interventional procedure (IP). Determine the reproducibility of indices of severity of PS.

Animals: Thirty-nine dogs with PS.

Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study. Five repeated echocardiograms were performed over 3 days. Day 1: two echocardiograms were performed by 2 different operators. Day 2: echocardiograms were performed before and after GA but before IP. Day 3: an echocardiogram was performed after the IP.

Results: After GA, median (IQR) cardiac index (2.1 [1.6-2.6] L/min/m), PVmeanPG (45.0 [26.0-55.2] mmHg), PVmaxPG (76.6 [46.6-100.3] mmHg) were decreased (p .001) compared to before GA (2.8 [2.2-3.0] L/min/m, 55.9 [47.6-73.1] mmHg, 96.1 [81.6-127.0] mmHg, respectively). There were no differences (p .35) in velocity ratio, VTI ratio, or iPVA after GA. Intra-operator and inter-operator coefficients of variation (95% CI) were highest for iPVA (13.8% [10.4-18.4] and 13.5% [11.0-18.4], respectively) and lowest for velocity ratio (9.2% [7.7-12.3] and 9.3% [7.7-12.4], respectively).

Conclusions And Clinical Importance: PVmeanPG and PVmaxPG might be misleading in states of reduced flow. An integrative assessment of severity of PS that includes less flow-dependent indices is recommended. Reproducibility of indices of severity of PS should be considered when re-evaluating dogs with PS.

References

Goncalves Sousa M, Carareto R, De-Nardi A, Brito F, Nunes N, Camacho A . Effects of isoflurane on Tei-index of myocardial performance in healthy dogs. Can Vet J. 2007; 48(3):277-82. PMC: 1800963. View

Winter R, Clark W, Cutchin E, Rhinehart J . Integrative echocardiographic assessment of post-operative obstruction severity and restenosis after balloon valvuloplasty in 81 dogs with pulmonary stenosis. J Vet Cardiol. 2023; 45:71-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2022.12.006. View

Visser L, Sintov D, Oldach M . Evaluation of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion measured by two-dimensional echocardiography in healthy dogs: repeatability, reference intervals, and comparison with M-mode assessment. J Vet Cardiol. 2018; 20(3):165-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2018.04.002. View

Keating S, Eberhard J, Friederich J, Wess G . Systolic function in dogs with pulmonic stenosis of different severities and the effect of balloon valvuloplasty. J Vet Cardiol. 2023; 46:40-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2023.03.004. View

Winter R, Rhinehart J, Estrada A, Maisenbacher 3rd H, Claretti M, Bussadori C . Repeat balloon valvuloplasty for dogs with recurrent or persistent pulmonary stenosis. J Vet Cardiol. 2021; 34:29-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2020.12.006. View

Winter R, Maneval K, Ferrel C, Clark W, Herrold E, Rhinehart J . Evaluation of right ventricular diastolic function, systolic function, and circulating galectin-3 concentrations in dogs with pulmonary stenosis. J Vet Intern Med. 2023; 37(6):2030-2038. PMC: 10658516. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16890. View

Bonagura J . Problems in the canine left ventricular outflow tract. J Vet Intern Med. 2001; 15(5):427-9. DOI: 10.1892/0891-6640(2001)15<427:epitcl>2.0.co;2. View

Kitabatake A, Fujii K, Tanouchi J, Ishihara K, Uematsu M, Masuyama T . Doppler echocardiographic quantitation of cross-sectional area under various hemodynamic conditions: an experimental validation in a canine model of supravalvular aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15(7):1654-61. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)92843-q. View

Borgeat K, Gomart S, Kilkenny E, Chanoit G, Hezzell M, Payne J . Transvalvular pulmonic stent angioplasty: procedural outcomes and complications in 15 dogs with pulmonic stenosis. J Vet Cardiol. 2021; 38:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2021.09.002. View

10.

Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers J, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S . Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017; 30(4):372-392. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009. View

11.

Popovic Z, Thomas J . Assessing observer variability: a user's guide. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017; 7(3):317-324. PMC: 5440257. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.12. View

12.

Visser L, Nishimura S, Oldach M, Belanger C, Gunther-Harrington C, Stern J . Echocardiographic assessment of right heart size and function in dogs with pulmonary valve stenosis. J Vet Cardiol. 2019; 26:19-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2019.11.002. View

13.

Bunting K, Steeds R, Slater K, Rogers J, Gkoutos G, Kotecha D . A Practical Guide to Assess the Reproducibility of Echocardiographic Measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019; 32(12):1505-1515. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.08.015. View

14.

Patata V, Vezzosi T, Marchesotti F, Zini E, Tognetti R, Domenech O . Right heart echocardiographic variables and prediction of clinical severity in dogs with pulmonary stenosis. J Vet Intern Med. 2023; 37(3):835-843. PMC: 10229350. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16679. View

15.

Locatelli C, Spalla I, Domenech O, Sala E, Brambilla P, Bussadori C . Pulmonic stenosis in dogs: survival and risk factors in a retrospective cohort of patients. J Small Anim Pract. 2013; 54(9):445-52. DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12113. View

16.

Nishimura S, Visser L, Belanger C, Oldach M, Gunther-Harrington C, Stern J . Echocardiographic evaluation of velocity ratio, velocity time integral ratio, and pulmonary valve area in dogs with pulmonary valve stenosis. J Vet Intern Med. 2018; 32(5):1570-1578. PMC: 6189360. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15244. View

17.

Kyranis S, Latona J, Platts D, Kelly N, Savage M, Brown M . Improving the echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary pressure using the tricuspid regurgitant signal-The "chin" vs the "beard". Echocardiography. 2018; 35(8):1085-1096. DOI: 10.1111/echo.13893. View

18.

Burwash I, Pearlman A, Kraft C, Healy N, Otto C . Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24(5):1342-50. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90118-x. View

19.

Visser L, Scansen B, Schober K, Bonagura J . Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular systolic function in conscious healthy dogs: repeatability and reference intervals. J Vet Cardiol. 2014; 17(2):83-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2014.10.003. View

20.

Gentile-Solomon J, Abbott J . Conventional echocardiographic assessment of the canine right heart: reference intervals and repeatability. J Vet Cardiol. 2016; 18(3):234-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvc.2016.05.002. View