Working Memory As the Focus of the Bilingual Effect in Executive Functions

Overview

Journal Behav Sci (Basel)

Date 2025 Feb 26

PMID 40001765

Authors

Jiejia Chen

Zitong Li

Zhiheng Xiong

Guangyuan Liu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The bilingual effect on executive functions (EFs) has garnered considerable attention, with most studies focusing on the visual domain and largely overlooking the auditory domain. Furthermore, research has predominantly concentrated on specific subcomponents of executive functions, with few studies systematically examining all three key subcomponents. This raises two important questions: (a) Is the bilingual effect specific to certain modalities (modality-specific), or a more general phenomenon (modality-general)? (b) Is the bilingual effect concentrated in a specific component of executive functions (process-specific), or does it extend to all three components (process-general)? To explore these questions, this study recruited monolingual Chinese and bilingual Chinese-English participants, using matched visual and auditory Stroop, N-back, and task-switching tasks to assess inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility in both groups. The results showed that, after controlling for variables like intelligence, socioeconomic status, and age, bilingualism significantly predicted performance in both auditory and visual working memory tasks, explaining 34% and 19% of the variance, respectively. However, no evidence was found to support a bilingual effect in inhibitory control or cognitive flexibility. In conclusion, these results suggest that bilingual effects are not only process-specific (affecting only working memory) but also modality-general (providing advantages in both visual and auditory modalities).

References

Schwering S, MacDonald M . Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:68. PMC: 7081770. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068. View

Lopez Zunini R, Morrison C, Kousaie S, Taler V . Task switching and bilingualism in young and older adults: A behavioral and electrophysiological investigation. Neuropsychologia. 2019; 133:107186. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107186. View

Thorell L, Lindqvist S, Bergman Nutley S, Bohlin G, Klingberg T . Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Dev Sci. 2009; 12(1):106-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00745.x. View

Xie Z, Zhou S . Bilingualism, Demographics, and Cognitive Control: A Within-Group Approach. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:94. PMC: 7000619. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00094. View

Lehtonen M, Soveri A, Laine A, Jarvenpaa J, de Bruin A, Antfolk J . Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2018; 144(4):394-425. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000142. View

Bialystok E, Poarch G, Luo L, Craik F . Effects of bilingualism and aging on executive function and working memory. Psychol Aging. 2014; 29(3):696-705. PMC: 4274603. DOI: 10.1037/a0037254. View

Bialystok E, Craik F . How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 29(4):1246-1269. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02057-5. View

Bialystok E . The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychol Bull. 2017; 143(3):233-262. PMC: 5324728. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000099. View

Friederici A . The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiol Rev. 2011; 91(4):1357-92. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011. View

10.

Olulade O, Jamal N, Koo D, Perfetti C, LaSasso C, Eden G . Neuroanatomical Evidence in Support of the Bilingual Advantage Theory. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 26(7):3196-204. PMC: 4898671. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv152. View

11.

Hargreaves D, Aksentijevic A . Music, IQ, and the executive function. Br J Psychol. 2011; 102(3):306-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02029.x. View

12.

Dick A, Garcia N, Pruden S, Thompson W, Hawes S, Sutherland M . No evidence for a bilingual executive function advantage in the nationally representative ABCD study. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 3(7):692-701. PMC: 7156280. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0609-3. View

13.

Diamond A, Ling D . Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016; 18:34-48. PMC: 5108631. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005. View

14.

Giguere D, Dickson D, Tulloch M, Hoff E . Majority language skill, not measures of bilingualism, predicts executive attention in bilingual children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2021; 213:105256. PMC: 10408728. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105256. View

15.

Grady C, Luk G, Craik F, Bialystok E . Brain network activity in monolingual and bilingual older adults. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 66:170-81. PMC: 4898959. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.042. View

16.

Hackman D, Farah M . Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(2):65-73. PMC: 3575682. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003. View

17.

Hilchey M, Klein R . Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 18(4):625-58. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0116-7. View

18.

Diamond A, Lee K . Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science. 2011; 333(6045):959-64. PMC: 3159917. DOI: 10.1126/science.1204529. View

19.

Will Crescioni A, Ehrlinger J, Alquist J, Conlon K, Baumeister R, Schatschneider C . High trait self-control predicts positive health behaviors and success in weight loss. J Health Psychol. 2011; 16(5):750-9. PMC: 4675362. DOI: 10.1177/1359105310390247. View

20.

Blumenfeld H, Marian V . Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition. 2010; 118(2):245-57. PMC: 3582323. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.012. View